Call for Adoption: draft-http-legally-restricted-status

[Mark Nottingham <[e-mail]>]

We discussed this document in Dallas:
  <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tbray-http-legally-restricted-status>

Based on the feedback received, I believe that we should adopt this document as a WG product, with a target of Proposed Standard.

Notably, there were no objections in the room to adopting this work, and while there has been some considerable discussion of the scope of this draft on-list in the past, I don’t see any argument that would prevent us from adopting it. 

I've discussed it with our Area Director, who agrees that it's a reasonable thing for us to do.

I don’t have an indication of how long this work will take; while it’s fairly straightforward technically, some discussion of its semantics are inevitable. In those, I expect to be led by the needs of the parties that actually want to produce and consume those semantics.

Please comment on-list; we’ll make a decision about adoption at the end of the week.

Regards,

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/