IETF Logo Mail Archive

Alt-Svc WGLC

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 14 December 2015 11:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C7C1AC43C for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 03:28:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9AcsldsFQjxr for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 03:28:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25F791AC43A for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 03:28:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1a8REd-0000FE-Oy for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:24:07 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:24:07 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1a8REd-0000FE-Oy@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1a8RET-0000DK-KK for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:23:57 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1a8REQ-0004hQ-Qp for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:23:56 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.158] ([5.10.171.186]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lskr7-1aFDct3kLp-012FdE for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 12:23:26 +0100
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <566EA6AF.60100@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 12:23:27 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:bvCEONDLJIRCE6HZwmLrlwssZz9CpJBwl9uUXem5TPSpSS6wQEP EXcRGtYRakg8hsteLHiWZ6Si/YaGzxCdNMVco9hFyyeT28ZTga0bYz1m1GU205CRtf7SKuf 3SE/GPXO9xXfgVKKRaZFdVI/+RlwlkVZHzMJGGk5K4jb10e0GeqbuO47Dh0Sd6VL1StH0of I3bAmaopcqHAiabkq4pow==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:uBiH2tVi5Ho=:838+zXs7AX2qYHZWBca+NX WJPrKEYHYN+FMLxPgT6ME2OZSDpo9x8KT9KTPYIYpbCdFX+IoLcWOwjfcfc7fV6gVi09Cc4Cn plLVJr49BLcosY/ag1gCrsdX/roFxr7G7knaydeP0KFqVT7v1t4EpunVy/iTQZwKJfUHjSCLW oeMLynuTrgFv7E/g31c0UCydvr1x9eJ9FlV6zoU5M9jdNz2V7Yjor1s0A2I+LAaI0kwumSzVN JNau2FsnmpJ61AFRUWfAp6CWP6Oo3hIeLPh4lVzSEzltHc+bFXVe2YheyU2v6zDjq/zEk5UvW eTBWLBJvxxox9NCboIEw8KTQJAy2A8BIJvAL7SrATZTudmL744vh65H0Z30kVficmwZ584JFN BPCw738i2iRZoJdadQLU8gl6qgm32+E3jfwnpIFBlzSpMxa9IEnwr8Hx81/qecxwe8xPtWnXQ agZl12/zOMkgdRje02EPtezuBKofDoonV1U+E8WUdN0kufeDNTi9P0vmcbYgIDHnEYSl72pEt YPgqUt00sZG5ztd6LRmWIGVfKzDhV9+QEKo75BtbYbIpg2s2wck1VSzyGDn6OQkTFdYdaK9fW q26teTZfroTv+Y0G5YnD4DgSDxFkATXLcVfSK/l4yRGLS2pzgY1fyLPGEWoilm08w7um7Z67J C2uOA1o4E87YKO99xaKVQsFuFMwrjF4EkpXXWhw+v3GBgMEB2aXcrumCJxy3291YSdIxCJjic u0yJZVzF58QBPx1LSRVUOUa7jKyDSOoR9sVw2ptPko8Szn8nvHsP22FkMDbINfyi5vbXVUVVq RgNsiVa
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.21; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1a8REQ-0004hQ-Qp c42896d020eeddc77c58765842561a10
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Alt-Svc WGLC
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/566EA6AF.60100@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/30771
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi there,

thanks for the feedback so far.

With the latest changes for issues 
<https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/125> and 
<https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/126> (see also 
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-latest-from-previous.diff.html>), 
I believe we're almost ready for a new draft and potentially IETF Last Call.

The remaining open points are:

1) In 
<https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2015OctDec/0375.html>, Hervé 
asked for an example of an ALTSVC frame. I note that the HTTP/2 spec 
doesn't have any examples of frames either, so I'm inclined not to add it.

2) In 
<https://github.com/hruellan/http-extensions/commit/fabd0943cde7e8af07f20b74acc2e48ac16e5f3e>, 
Hervé proposes a change that IMHO is not editorial as it affects a 
normative requirement. Feedback appreciated.

3) Mike Bishop proposed a change in 
<https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/101> which I was not 
happy with. Instead, I made the change 
<https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/acc3ae3c4290323069501d55ea8cdb5bacdbc6e8> 
(which is already in the WGLC draft FWIW). Is anybody not ok with this 
resolution?

Best regards, Julian

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status