Re: Multiple Alt-Svc parameters of the same type
Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org> Mon, 16 January 2017 18:22 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0EF11295BD for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:22:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EJV3d42WnI8N for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:22:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D44B1294D7 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:22:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cTBs0-0002N5-NW for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 18:19:04 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 18:19:04 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cTBs0-0002N5-NW@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <khurtta@welho.com>) id 1cTBrw-0002Lf-6S for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 18:19:00 +0000
Received: from welho-filter1.welho.com ([83.102.41.23]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <khurtta@welho.com>) id 1cTBro-0001Fw-Sk for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 18:18:55 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by welho-filter1.welho.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A39514617; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 20:18:25 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at pp.htv.fi
Received: from welho-smtp1.welho.com ([IPv6:::ffff:83.102.41.84]) by localhost (welho-filter1.welho.com [::ffff:83.102.41.23]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SriLWfaJXMdi; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 20:18:23 +0200 (EET)
Received: from hurtta09lk.keh.iki.fi (89-27-35-245.bb.dnainternet.fi [89.27.35.245]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by welho-smtp1.welho.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8CFB27F; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 20:18:23 +0200 (EET)
In-Reply-To: <7CF7F94CB496BF4FAB1676F375F9666A376B9A92@bgb01xud1012>
References: <7CF7F94CB496BF4FAB1676F375F9666A376B9A92@bgb01xud1012>
To: Lucas Pardue <Lucas.Pardue@bbc.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 20:18:23 +0200
Sender: hurtta@hurtta09lk.keh.iki.fi
From: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
CC: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
X-Mailer: ELM [version ME+ 2.5 PLalpha44+]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20170116181825.4A39514617@welho-filter1.welho.com>
Received-SPF: none client-ip=83.102.41.23; envelope-from=khurtta@welho.com; helo=welho-filter1.welho.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.445, BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1cTBro-0001Fw-Sk 90feb79f6c75563d247907c43d16534e
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Multiple Alt-Svc parameters of the same type
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20170116181825.4A39514617@welho-filter1.welho.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33292
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> For example, is it OK for a server to generate multiple “persist” > parameters perhaps with different values, how should a client deal with > that? Perhaps I’m worrying too much. Bad example, I think. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7838#section-3.1 | This specification only defines a single value for "persist". | Clients MUST ignore "persist" parameters with values other than "1". I think that persist=1 and persist=1;persist=1 are equivalent. And all other persists values are ignored. ( Although it also make sense treat that same way than unknown parameter values. ) But betetr question is, what client should do when there is several "ma" paramater values. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7838#section-3.1 | Syntax: | | ma = delta-seconds; see [RFC7234], Section 1.2.1 | | The delta-seconds value indicates the number of seconds since the | response was generated for which the alternative service is | considered fresh. There is only | This specification defines two parameters: "ma" and "persist", | defined in Section 3.1. Unknown parameters MUST be ignored. That | is, the values (alt-value) they appear in MUST be processed as if the | unknown parameter was not present. Because this is not defined all of these make sense ∙ Pick first value ∙ Pick last value ∙ Pick smallest "ma" value ∙ Pick largest "ma" value ∙ Treate that as unknown parameter ∙ Consider alternative service as invalid because max-age is unclear / Kari Hurtta
- Multiple Alt-Svc parameters of the same type Lucas Pardue
- Re: Multiple Alt-Svc parameters of the same type Kari Hurtta
- RE: Multiple Alt-Svc parameters of the same type Lucas Pardue
- Re: Multiple Alt-Svc parameters of the same type Martin Thomson
- Re: Multiple Alt-Svc parameters of the same type Martin Thomson
- RE: Multiple Alt-Svc parameters of the same type Mike Bishop
- Re: Multiple Alt-Svc parameters of the same type Martin Thomson
- RE: Multiple Alt-Svc parameters of the same type Lucas Pardue
- Re: Multiple Alt-Svc parameters of the same type Martin Thomson