Alt-Svc over DNS
Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> Tue, 16 January 2018 17:29 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1554A12E054 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 09:29:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.76
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.76 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id THXg3vSm69hh for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 09:29:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC5AF13160C for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 09:28:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1ebV0H-000438-Kf for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:26:29 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:26:29 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1ebV0H-000438-Kf@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <bemasc@google.com>) id 1ebV09-00042H-On for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:26:21 +0000
Received: from mail-it0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <bemasc@google.com>) id 1ebV08-0002NF-AG for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:26:21 +0000
Received: by mail-it0-f44.google.com with SMTP id 196so5725747iti.5 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 09:26:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=H43hDwJ0XL6nfg/VwiucHVGVFS/2oZXYBLMHvLtlZeY=; b=Phl+R999jmI6qR5LrznNl6w6qpGESKD53LEj1qk8cftB/+vL2/rWkOTRD3Dlic3rcN emls8E8gXP7esCIVwi1ASGBl0h2oFGtonDrqK86rKjXqW4v6q54Hok4XdDX1/XE5qmjZ jNxUxHbulT9yYivZtVjDPKXtKzO24DaO5ua0J5ZD63DZ2Vzw0j9pVWG/FlWcoa+SrMj7 Jv4kB9SltOBaE53C4GSGJbPRkTD3PyDfpEzli4e4q6+eNAHn73Pxqj78OqDR3Cku0cjN S+52SUjmXTQ6YMNMFKZmC3BPWb1Q/MJv/sMr0YG5KcOAM3IB55FunLto8KeD0kbUI4DN KDRg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=H43hDwJ0XL6nfg/VwiucHVGVFS/2oZXYBLMHvLtlZeY=; b=lJqtvNC+B+ggFojVudSMk35ADQNTmNfLy8SQcpLGC4vLoxfodNMYeNzg0coW7BZo1O TyC6YTYXylIpNrkLX/AQeWwxDS4/120NFWdoH78jY4MSZ1XxUQeiiE/GMtZV1620Syru 5QdRj0ZZ61uudsY3W0u1Ps/pdD6Je5mZPNqOoEwaPexXM4CAh9jPKQcatRcKACcF3AED aIv70Acd9hNuQU6kWmxF6YjDhCCpEzkzBlVcH7BB/hWNdMemTfBEgXazoHfR28gQ5g8H /qgcKbVnr/wcRMbP94Y3Sw1VD2am9qjVLVoZglwAiezSeqO1zxL0/U3KG2CwiiGBcJqn Nn6g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytff6IPsY5n7YXAD4Im1ELNjF9Lr1dFM7GgBWHDtd0MPmcshBtJx X+ySTOzCEu6Y/CMUR2Xxa9Suj7a7+GWwnEADyIyGSIFe3Vw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBouNHRK++6vunb1ilLkAvDD3hUPm/7raUxCBZQe5xOf7RQkArlvhP0oLwU876NBs80eV+cgEXhOKRjDd8fziYs4=
X-Received: by 10.36.114.149 with SMTP id x143mr20698338itc.82.1516123558989; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 09:25:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.164.160 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 09:25:58 -0800 (PST)
From: Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 12:25:58 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbrMsAXJT1ctB_4c+EU1b3WyVax1F9pQ3oUZFMKJva6e9VpwA@mail.gmail.com>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="001a11450d6033dfc00562e80638"
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.067, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1ebV08-0002NF-AG c61cfe8c99371948daa399dcf92c9d42
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Alt-Svc over DNS
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CAHbrMsAXJT1ctB_4c+EU1b3WyVax1F9pQ3oUZFMKJva6e9VpwA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/35012
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Hi HTTPBIS, As Mike Bishop noted last month, "Alt-Svc in DNS keeps coming up" [1]. Now Mike and I have a draft describing how that would work: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-schwartz-httpbis-dns-alt-svc Putting Alt-Svc information in the DNS offers both performance and privacy advantages. Please take a look! --Ben P.S. I admit this design bears a suspicious resemblance to Erik Nygren's "B" record proposal from 2014 [2]. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2017OctDec/0391.html [2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nygren-service-bindings-00
- Alt-Svc over DNS Ben Schwartz
- RE: Alt-Svc over DNS Lucas Pardue
- Re: Alt-Svc over DNS Ben Schwartz
- Re: Alt-Svc over DNS Erik Nygren
- RE: Alt-Svc over DNS Lucas Pardue
- RE: Alt-Svc over DNS Mike Bishop
- RE: Alt-Svc over DNS Lucas Pardue