Re: RFC 9110: HTTP Semantics - Terminology: "applying a request" (was Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530))

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de> Wed, 31 May 2023 14:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A61C151076 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 May 2023 07:38:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.949
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qXo5nrIzoF-q for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 May 2023 07:38:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62990C151075 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 31 May 2023 07:38:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1q4Mvi-003bOR-Tn for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 31 May 2023 14:36:02 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 14:36:02 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1q4Mvi-003bOR-Tn@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>) id 1q4Mvh-003bNA-9a for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 31 May 2023 14:36:01 +0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de ([217.91.35.233]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>) id 1q4Mvf-00B6hD-Qb for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 31 May 2023 14:36:00 +0000
Received: by mail.greenbytes.de (Postfix, from userid 119) id A5E8498014D; Wed, 31 May 2023 16:35:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] (unknown [91.61.57.207]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.greenbytes.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9EB3A98014D; Wed, 31 May 2023 16:35:38 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <bc4b2c60-8cd3-1bba-0f47-bdf59e812058@greenbytes.de>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 16:35:35 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.2
To: Philippe Cloutier <chealer@gmail.com>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <20230529214703.0DAA385293@rfcpa.amsl.com> <4D37E8D2-A2DF-4C50-9F8F-1A6E1BDEAB48@gbiv.com> <5af7c873-950f-5d74-f8c3-c237f8b81b88@gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
In-Reply-To: <5af7c873-950f-5d74-f8c3-c237f8b81b88@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.91.35.233; envelope-from=julian.reschke@greenbytes.de; helo=mail.greenbytes.de
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.091, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1q4Mvf-00B6hD-Qb 3f280445b7c76104feeb454a0ca44adb
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: RFC 9110: HTTP Semantics - Terminology: "applying a request" (was Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530))
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/bc4b2c60-8cd3-1bba-0f47-bdf59e812058@greenbytes.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/51132
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 31.05.2023 16:32, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
> ...

Everybody: this is clearly a just a terminology discussion. Please 
understand that errata are not about terminology preferences of the 
authors, in particular if they've been this year for a long time.

RFC-Editor, please reject this. This is not an erratum.

Best regards, Julian

-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH, Hafenweg 16, D-48155 Münster, Germany
Amtsgericht Münster: HRB5782