Call for Adoption: Early Hints (103)
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Thu, 08 December 2016 04:05 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A7A312964B for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 20:05:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.797
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.797 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gnr-f5L1pP87 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 20:05:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13388129654 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 20:05:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cEpuR-0001mo-2A for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 04:02:15 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 04:02:15 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cEpuR-0001mo-2A@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1cEpuD-0001la-U0 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 04:02:01 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1cEpu7-0000h9-9n for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 04:01:56 +0000
Received: from [192.168.3.104] (unknown [124.189.98.244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CADCF22E255; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 23:01:29 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAOdDvNos+qXxi8K3HPtkuzkAuc1ctAmdt=Oz+vJy+oBgB7skQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 15:01:26 +1100
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F80E59B7-AF83-4E1C-9BA4-15A122D0D434@mnot.net>
References: <CAOdDvNos+qXxi8K3HPtkuzkAuc1ctAmdt=Oz+vJy+oBgB7skQA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.746, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1cEpu7-0000h9-9n 767314bae74a6068e9f6902ecfaf69db
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Call for Adoption: Early Hints (103)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/F80E59B7-AF83-4E1C-9BA4-15A122D0D434@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33124
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Based on the discussion so far, it seems like there's strong support for adopting this draft. Anyone have additional comments? > On 23 Nov. 2016, at 9:26 am, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com> wrote: > > Dear Gentlefolk of HTTPbis, > > This is a followup to Kazuho's presentation in Seoul[*] where he discussed https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code/ > > The idea seemed to have acceptance (both in the room and on the list) with some concerns expressed about interoperability. Kazuho was kind enough to publish an endpoint so you can test if the client you implement has an unexpected failure in the face of 103. > > However, the draft was published pretty close to meeting time and there wasn't much space for discussion in the room. So before we do a Call For Adoption, I would like to hear some more discussion so the chairs can be confident there is interest - even if that discussion is "I would like to implement that" or "what does that accomplish?". Please do chime in, your silence will be taken for disinterest otherwise :). > > -Patrick > > [*] http://recs.conf.meetecho.com/Playout/watch.jsp?recording=IETF97_HTTPBIS&chapter=chapter_1 goto 1:43 mark -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
- Early Hints (103) Patrick McManus
- Re: Early Hints (103) Julian Reschke
- Re: Early Hints (103) Stefan Eissing
- Re: Early Hints (103) Stefan Eissing
- Re: Early Hints (103) Kazuho Oku
- Re: Early Hints (103) Martin J. Dürst
- Re: Early Hints (103) Cory Benfield
- Re: Early Hints (103) Daurnimator
- RE: Early Hints (103) Mike Bishop
- Re: Early Hints (103) Göran Eriksson AP
- Re: Early Hints (103) Bence Béky
- Re: Early Hints (103) Amos Jeffries
- Call for Adoption: Early Hints (103) Mark Nottingham
- Re: Call for Adoption: Early Hints (103) Mark Nottingham
- Re: Call for Adoption: Early Hints (103) Kazuho Oku