Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very bad in 2015...
"Walter H." <Walter.H@mathemainzel.info> Fri, 03 April 2015 06:38 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4651A9112 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 23:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.012
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.012 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fkXRSZ0PIpbo for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 23:38:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEEBC1A9110 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 23:38:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1YdvBY-0005tx-6J for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 06:34:32 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 06:34:32 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1YdvBY-0005tx-6J@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <Walter.H@mathemainzel.info>) id 1YdvBT-0005t9-8y for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 06:34:27 +0000
Received: from mx16lb.world4you.com ([81.19.149.126]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <Walter.H@mathemainzel.info>) id 1YdvBR-0006Ba-ND for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 06:34:27 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mathemainzel.info; s=dkim11; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=BOXfdiVymP54V1NgKnZYBHolivLxT+ZQLbiRhoAyyaM=; b=qCrHalZrCcWjTLFosVCm0c3iridDKrubjQTb6bYWKBM+gGxc+C+nav/MrmJglX2tAPbm79KpolPNDBNRFLq3Ig4o0+wT+qKzd/i2F8ty2SBhLc9w3DD9/YbvNXI0hQYJ8uElPYlkuyo0jyt+cUup+pBeNqgkCFe2p8IDiY5vkkg=;
Received: from [90.146.128.86] (helo=outgoing.router) by mx16lb.world4you.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <Walter.H@mathemainzel.info>) id 1YdvAz-0006oT-EO; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 08:33:57 +0200
Received: <hidden>
Received: <hidden>
Received: <hidden>
Message-ID: <551E3450.7070503@mathemainzel.info>
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 08:33:52 +0200
From: "Walter H." <Walter.H@mathemainzel.info>
Organization: Home
X-Mailer: Mozilla/5.0 (UNIX; U; Cray X-MP/48; en-US; rv:2.70) Gecko/20110929 Communicator/7.20
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
CC: "mnot@mnot.net" <mnot@mnot.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <D141A3E5.4146E%evyncke@cisco.com> <20150401114608.GA7832@1wt.eu> <551D9397.3070300@mathemainzel.info> <20150402193243.GA8875@1wt.eu> <551DA867.5060800@mathemainzel.info> <20150402205112.GB8928@1wt.eu> <551E2FAA.2000905@mathemainzel.info> <20150403062105.GA14296@1wt.eu>
In-Reply-To: <20150403062105.GA14296@1wt.eu>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms060000000302020502050707"
X-SA-Do-Not-Run: Yes
X-AV-Do-Run: Yes
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 90.146.128.86
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: Walter.H@mathemainzel.info
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mx16lb.world4you.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.19.149.126; envelope-from=Walter.H@mathemainzel.info; helo=mx16lb.world4you.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.525, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_NW=1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1YdvBR-0006Ba-ND 7c00dd60de2a56db2b1a6bf8b2d7f6e8
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very bad in 2015...
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/551E3450.7070503@mathemainzel.info>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/29228
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On 03.04.2015 08:21, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 08:14:02AM +0200, Walter H. wrote: >> have you ever looked at your cards (credit, debit, ...) a little bit >> more precise? >> they have both the magnetic part on back and the chip on front ... > Yes and you can even erase it (and lose access to parkings and tolls). > yes, and you also can make a 1:1 copy on another "duplicate" card ... guess why you lose access? >>> The magnetic part contains the same things that are printed on the card. >> wrong information; the magnetic part has the ident function as the chip >> ... > Nothing related to the pin. You *cannot* use your PIN offline with the > magnetic stripe. wrong, outside the EU the only way ... >> guess why you must enable your card for areas outside EU? >> (this rule is since Jan, 1st 2015) > So that your bank accepts transactions from outside the SEPA area. > and how does this payment really work? > Anyway I'm not interested in pursuing this useless conversation, I'm > wasting my time trying to convince you you're mistaken and that's not > my problem. I'd say, I should tell this somewhere, to sort you out from IETF workgroup, because your wrong knowledge is a risk to the whole internet get the right information, to be able to talk about ... have a nice day
- Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very bad i… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Willy Tarreau
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Willy Tarreau
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Michael Sweet
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Willy Tarreau
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Jim Manico
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Willy Tarreau
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Max Bruce
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Willy Tarreau
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Max Bruce
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Willy Tarreau
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Michael Sweet
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Michael Sweet
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Jim Manico
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Michael Sweet
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Zhong Yu
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Martin Thomson
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Zhong Yu
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Zhong Yu
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Martin Thomson
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Zhong Yu
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Michael Sweet
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Jim Manico
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Jim Manico
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Walter H.
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Willy Tarreau
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Walter H.
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Willy Tarreau
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Walter H.
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Max Bruce
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Walter H.
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Max Bruce
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Jim Manico
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Walter H.
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Walter H.
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Jim Manico
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Max Bruce
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Max Bruce
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Jim Manico
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: Linking a cookie to an IP address is a very b… Walter H.