Re: p2: Accept-Language missing, empty or no match

Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> Tue, 30 April 2013 10:09 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DED121F9B50 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 03:09:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9xDRenHWC3qM for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 03:09:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 473E321F9AB9 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 03:09:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UX7TI-0004f5-5Y for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:07:40 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:07:40 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UX7TI-0004f5-5Y@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <derhoermi@gmx.net>) id 1UX7T6-0004dc-GP for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:07:28 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <derhoermi@gmx.net>) id 1UX7T5-0005up-EN for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:07:28 +0000
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.10]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MQKkE-1U3Wpc451w-00Tp6E for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 12:07:01 +0200
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2013 10:07:00 -0000
Received: from p5B2306C7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO netb.Speedport_W_700V) [91.35.6.199] by mail.gmx.net (mp010) with SMTP; 30 Apr 2013 12:07:00 +0200
X-Authenticated: #723575
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19iFJISc2ViFEU5FdiJJbx5whTHZ6+uIG1OYK9QQw UKus5GRFpo6JeY
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 12:07:00 +0200
Message-ID: <sn5vn8pe3hins3oeghba9qrkcooustfmg8@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <8741FE69-C013-4853-A9A3-6321A18E56EA@mnot.net> <2896D8B9-399D-4F68-9BC1-9EFDB893C2BE@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <2896D8B9-399D-4F68-9BC1-9EFDB893C2BE@mnot.net>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.15.15; envelope-from=derhoermi@gmx.net; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.162, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.509, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UX7T5-0005up-EN 7788b961ffc88c6d05d2ffdc01f1bf7b
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: p2: Accept-Language missing, empty or no match
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/sn5vn8pe3hins3oeghba9qrkcooustfmg8@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17722
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

* Mark Nottingham wrote:
>Anyone disagree with adding similar text to Accept-Language? If not, I'll mark for incorporation.

I certainly disagree with adding text suggesting it's as good an idea to
respond with 406 due to Accept-Language as it is to respond with 406 due
to Accept, Accept-Charset, or Accept-Encoding, the latter all being ca-
pabilities of the user agent, while Accept-Language refers to the user's
education. Back in the day I had to add `*` to my Accept-Language header
to avoid this failure case, which was indeed present on several sites. I
could probably live with noting 406 is okay "somehow", but the text must
be very different from the text for the other headers.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/