IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?

Dr Robert Mattson <robert@mattson.com.au> Mon, 18 February 2013 00:49 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC5C121F8B65 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:49:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_43=0.6, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q3+BqZ9s2gM8 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:49:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14F5C21F8B63 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:49:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1U7Etv-0002Zt-03 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:48:11 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:48:11 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1U7Etv-0002Zt-03@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <robert@mattson.com.au>) id 1U7Etm-0002Z9-3l for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:48:02 +0000
Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.145]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <robert@mattson.com.au>) id 1U7Etk-0000Ny-Md for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:48:02 +0000
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAGN5IVF4ksni/2dsb2JhbAANOIZJuVQWgQODEgEBAQMBI1YFCwsEFBUVAgIhNgYTiAADCawPcYdZDYlajFmCKzMHCoIjMmEDlFGNHogw
Received: from cpe-120-146-201-226.static.vic.bigpond.net.au (HELO [192.168.0.143]) ([120.146.201.226]) by ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 18 Feb 2013 11:17:35 +1030
References: <CAMm+LwiF6EM8_aQgUm=nPS5XqaG25iRGNke_rnHTM1vTGMXdfg@mail.gmail.com> <A6A82B6EF92590887D2A23D5@cyrus.local> <D9118B58-F53F-4F75-8292-2B990172E234@opengroupware.org> <CABP7RbcX2OqttZuYeuYxhyOgE_ax0M67L1ywPy_VDpW1upM69Q@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <CABP7RbcX2OqttZuYeuYxhyOgE_ax0M67L1ywPy_VDpW1upM69Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-62683317-7A05-4044-B5C1-40D73E419510"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <238FD677-096D-4971-B1CC-D75045E4DF49@mattson.com.au>
Cc: Helge Heß <helge.hess@opengroupware.org>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B141)
From: Dr Robert Mattson <robert@mattson.com.au>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:47:32 +1100
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Received-SPF: none client-ip=150.101.137.145; envelope-from=robert@mattson.com.au; helo=ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.501, BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_HK_NAME_DR=0.01
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1U7Etk-0000Ny-Md 6e7fcbc7a58b5a780b85ff47074ee873
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/238FD677-096D-4971-B1CC-D75045E4DF49@mattson.com.au>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/16640
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hey Guys,

What do you think of the request compression and response multiplexing scheme advocated by HTTP-MPLEX?

Rob

Sent on a mobile device, typos expected.

On 18/02/2013, at 10:07 AM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:

> An mget that leverages server push in http/2 and individual cacheable response streams would be very interesting and could address at least some of the prioritization issues.
> 
> On Feb 17, 2013 12:17 PM, "Helge Heß" <helge.hess@opengroupware.org> wrote:
>> On Feb 17, 2013, at 11:18 AM, Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name> wrote:
>> > We added a multiget REPORT to CalDAV (RFC4791) and CardDAV (RFC6352) which is used by clients when sync'ing a lot of resources (e.g., initial account setup). The one major criticism has been lack of cacheability of the individual resources included in the multiget.
>> 
>> The other major criticisms being:
>> a) content needs to be XML encoded
>> b) only allows for GETs, not for other operations
>> 
>> I'd also like to see a generic, HTTP-level BATCH request. Please lets not do 'just' an MGET.
>> 
>> hh

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email