Subject: Re: A structured format for dates?

From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 06:53:59 +0000

--------
Mark Nottingham writes:
> 
>
> > On 17 Jun 2022, at 4:20 pm, Poul-Henning Kamp <[email-masked]> =
> wrote:
> >=20
> > Introducing ISO 8601 as yet another textual timestamp format,
> > offering no upside over the three already codified textual timestamp
> > formats, would be not only pointless, it would be a regression, for
> > instance in terms of HPACK efficiency.
>
> When it's textual, yes. If Binary Structured Fields happens, that's not
> an issue.

It will still be in log files, but that is of course "Somebody Elses Problem" :-)

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[email-masked]         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.