IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6266 (5383)

Natasha Carroll <carrollmaria79@gmail.com> Thu, 07 June 2018 14:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E695130EFB for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 07:04:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.76
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.76 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hnxzcUcgA19A for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 07:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE65D128BAC for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 07:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1fQvPF-0006Si-MM for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 13:56:49 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 13:56:49 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1fQvPF-0006Si-MM@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <carrollmaria79@gmail.com>) id 1fQvP6-0006RU-RB for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 13:56:40 +0000
Received: from mail-qt0-f194.google.com ([209.85.216.194]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <carrollmaria79@gmail.com>) id 1fQvP3-0006mu-29 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 13:56:40 +0000
Received: by mail-qt0-f194.google.com with SMTP id h5-v6so9876427qtm.13 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 06:56:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+VkTe2UHDbz/hjV+i5lBskFTJCzExgnmDx8Wwe99FOY=; b=FON+rFMxnYbaYAU+WxYVZY1s+tRH8J+G+AFXyl1vQRFYGXgfSz/Xn9Y2GnNK2NeFpu 7c+l3Tx7wcwCFg3U3gBzqFdKG4Yn6YIj3Nq/onvrjv+CW7Rzacmcc7H66Lxp1tBBLA2x 5Ew2mhsA8aTFIeaoLzeAVU+LnpAb4NuQklY7WKiFwiN+hFkqcchkzfVJ/p8ZbY6ytJJL UZYe1CObFcRuUmA0yZabczORhqN9cgskOnEEe/hHKyrKuRpOUw0LKUXes2OTRuj7XrCj av1LYGwi4z3K6buKFqi3tE5nD3CepKDo0wmov49NFfeL6O080ClZm52/CNvU+DCbVSAL Qwiw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+VkTe2UHDbz/hjV+i5lBskFTJCzExgnmDx8Wwe99FOY=; b=bHrIKEChDPQc13XT7cmnJRp2WLT6eKNBFa+YRRzD4+PQ1LJnWnvG8V4E3npHQYXInz bXrP7rQcu+hx8UwPsbRa7fmCStixpQDYc7wgAk5M9AzBRQkpXm16BJOPeuRVsrTno5iS rh2tZHi3L4Wtjrg0TZ3AM9L7Qe2RyiTY3gONUsc1Hmn1JLnpm3BVkV4TTloytg1KwHvt q2JDpHY2xuqk1hyVConTe2tR5jOyO940wNOI1sTC3n0y8WVcOCtGVpmsyVAQo3HRz1TX ACjsZkPzCvBB18PnYfrVttEhJj3T7IIGvzS7vF162Tadf5rZlNHvozVof3m/VkJ3QgUR EAYQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E01DE42iUNKgt5M45wmM4rmNWA/bcN4Rf48828QstqLGuPDKo3T NuNCWDlRvIVyKKcijGTJ6H1yPXODyiE8qYjhcDc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKK9zno03b+lUtQbmBXBXHMfWU5dwyZQWzh2eTAbewfo1nSbcf6abDSYsi06ToQQgNLVoeFXJOr+vmk/unqyzV0=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:2d0e:: with SMTP id n14-v6mr1873705qta.338.1528379776349; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 06:56:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20180607130307.8B911B828C3@rfc-editor.org> <9d18a338-3379-6cd5-4390-3441964f7dbb@greenbytes.de>
In-Reply-To: <9d18a338-3379-6cd5-4390-3441964f7dbb@greenbytes.de>
From: Natasha Carroll <carrollmaria79@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 23:56:04 +1000
Message-ID: <CAErkdSt3S6Y7SbyXDoA=43nRa70XZzaohd6JaQgp6joE1SabAA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, ben@nostrum.com, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, adam@nostrum.com, mnot@mnot.net, pmcmanus@mozilla.com, magnar@myrtveit.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a6bc39056e0da54d"
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.333, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1fQvP3-0006mu-29 9eb0b64f19f07d73010a6bd781422ca7
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6266 (5383)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CAErkdSt3S6Y7SbyXDoA=43nRa70XZzaohd6JaQgp6joE1SabAA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/35510
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

It's a hacker your helping

On Thu, Jun 7, 2018, 11:18 PM Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
wrote:

> On 2018-06-07 15:03, RFC Errata System wrote:
> > ...
>
> I believe we should reject this erratum.
>
> Reasons:
>
> 1) When we'll revise RFC 6266, it'll be based on RFC 8187, not RFC 5987.
> This changes the whole base (of what is defined how in the ABNF).
>
> 2) To define new parameters for Content-Disposition, a spec would have
> to update RFC 6266, in which case the WG and/or IESG will need to ensure
> that no parameter name ending in "*" is defined without using the RFC
> 8187 encoding.
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email