IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Flow control clarification

William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org> Sat, 20 July 2013 21:20 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62DBE11E80E0 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 14:20:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.609
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.609 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.067, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wbQmzCvey4OV for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 14:20:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98A811E80D1 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 14:20:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1V0eZA-0005EI-AG for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 21:19:48 +0000
Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 21:19:48 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1V0eZA-0005EI-AG@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <willchan@google.com>) id 1V0eZ1-0005Ca-Q6 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 21:19:39 +0000
Received: from mail-ie0-f176.google.com ([209.85.223.176]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <willchan@google.com>) id 1V0eZ1-0000ns-3k for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 21:19:39 +0000
Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id ar20so12127076iec.21 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 14:19:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=7ukMVoJxHDuS6ACh3mXbuZMhvfWGN9YS2EGGwxB7EuY=; b=l+/kPKkhPotyE2FlJ4+5fwN6D8BAS3GxWwPnCurWW/VUuzUo7pgkYrsErxOsNhKsuI XgJEy8QhSOCYy5qgTpt46nnFo81wLcL26sQhStRz/TAd44jFv2fBFDHEpg35QxU4lz0B qDoOkAtqjV+YtygoR7uwmbFDrf2FkKqGHHz7WxESizIF1HMSVNKDimcu8K7Fzry+zcMe 0np0e5HVi7ZThti/HDlYlWaRr4GKD/9WO4mdSjGmIUan0V5jxpbegxSihEq1LNlhV3v7 ra+7patrSQKo/23PPk+0rgBhDTXhVqKJPO2HgDTFCzCUJ8AJO8da2YbnVoXcka/P8hRQ ompg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=7ukMVoJxHDuS6ACh3mXbuZMhvfWGN9YS2EGGwxB7EuY=; b=oIlI4MJaXFEPA7FJimpNQFrO4ZXBGUT9EOtyiis30ol1lLf26NmEOuFVfnuQmCPiVR 1MaShf/aMPDvwNllMjCSIz2LozdjUj7pgc38koKtegtadN+fOsorpQnNVlWS+LqfDVqU XqnZXu628FZeQgdZpNbwVrr8lsmA7IRCprOc8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=7ukMVoJxHDuS6ACh3mXbuZMhvfWGN9YS2EGGwxB7EuY=; b=mEl2odcP76nPBhYmVGEsvq8Jpj8V3V+W7AAmQ19LK99PEDjLrnqDPJXUm+mft2IPWr 7rRQv+sFULUHzqGxyHXuFB+/2IADrp8lTbhoqWHEteFVJq1L+XR/6BPlmdwl1x3KijMU gT2c5xFrPERz1qGmo2orjGrCvrwEUAbPKhyODg/EHMSLcsTQZHiJmNoWc05Zmr2wo4qc ZZ5NOik7t9fsgu/BqTku85aYuGk0GTe5Yp1v45jeB79l3CPSguPPzktbHWX7dq+NWyaY nmehMH4g6Znj3S3+0JDbojrDlzgaId0gRYGeEuowSYbyUUnWxmRleo9/dcn2RFh3YXFn /MYA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.42.158.9 with SMTP id f9mr13953346icx.111.1374355153100; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 14:19:13 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: willchan@google.com
Received: by 10.64.129.164 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 14:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CE104626.4728F%sludin@akamai.com>
References: <CABkgnnV1mSg6jgn0BPP-GYyzCZvBTXdq7D3_vonTmP6cMG9VsQ@mail.gmail.com> <CE104626.4728F%sludin@akamai.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 14:19:12 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: opASTmoHIuaDoaD-JzHFGk7Tyn8
Message-ID: <CAA4WUYgvvCGF5NrRO4XBCPoWxAqW_oYG2V=07rLQUypMTO5TPg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "William Chan (陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org>
To: "Ludin, Stephen" <sludin@akamai.com>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="90e6ba21219bb24c2d04e1f7fe0f"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnnxqWPG1SUvcqiRt/9Utk4mFtOYsUktSYz/3jYZMLu4Q8PRlp1uT2aZh7ynvCLvNKcnTS0rHdrOVmcac4h7q6ucPPyWRNRY4KZsfQUbghVU4vtd1cq7kgx3L9NyaSSmXGb7ThZ4tJ+7hHYfd5uozyPQ8Tr63UwqpZfOW5s5Rt/L+NeaOwRyJhyYfyi6AETQEB6QCjP
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.223.176; envelope-from=willchan@google.com; helo=mail-ie0-f176.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.545, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.39, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1V0eZ1-0000ns-3k fdcf95d544e3abd440d6912a63ee6d22
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Flow control clarification
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAA4WUYgvvCGF5NrRO4XBCPoWxAqW_oYG2V=07rLQUypMTO5TPg@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18859
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Yes.


On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Ludin, Stephen <sludin@akamai.com> wrote:

> I want to make certain I am reading this correctly (section 6.9.1):  If a
> receiver has not disabled flow control, it is responsible for sending two
> WINDOW_UPDATE frames to maintain flow: one for the stream and one for the
> connection.  Correct?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -stephen
>
>
>
>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status