Re: Setting to disable HTTP/2 Priorities

Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Thu, 25 July 2019 19:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F591201CA for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gyu1ORMaV4Bx for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 112921201C5 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1hqjX8-0003Ib-Dj for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 19:36:10 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 19:36:10 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1hqjX8-0003Ib-Dj@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4c]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>) id 1hqjX5-0003Hm-DA for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 19:36:07 +0000
Received: from mail-ua1-x931.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::931]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>) id 1hqjX4-0003hP-6c for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 19:36:07 +0000
Received: by mail-ua1-x931.google.com with SMTP id j21so20350118uap.2 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=lb0efbNTRl3TpRBZMPXcr2Z/ywQqFsgL7RYOLRCj+wM=; b=vUybKBYjqHSiMrTC/M4fE6SJ7Suq1j0pnZtZV/rZyaEBVqS0Q/M0PAi1Dos//bRtcz uyaEeHzvw9QGKFd4bZrfmO7Lb4L/GS0cNS9YD9h97YFfMofaua1oqE/L/XUAI5TgvfFI MyGABSxsVEZ64rqAU89/jQUETZN3mHerwd7CDC2sI4AjGSR21v/eQlQ/KeF2avHH9x3s 5pQyA8MVRtwGuqUA0KiyxQjmvQO+4mrca8loc3SshuVtUzGHQ3NkNMF+icEGjLYxN0YV riIcM5g2qC3dkZHt9GMY4ilLRMxAdsOCI6+bNDmHw2QEwPRUK2BZXCZLTkB5d6htMgTU LwCQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=lb0efbNTRl3TpRBZMPXcr2Z/ywQqFsgL7RYOLRCj+wM=; b=hNPD5ofd2ktgzj4O1yr21oS9EMWeMs1lnlC8V8IH9SSRzLpE5C2NDr/4/MwZ50LBUq xpbfWc3ch4oMF1piGVpWp/co4eKKTSJ9C0LnbZ67z9Z1q89XhS3jfrerJ0HdNPRKE3O7 GnJ5bkJTi/nr1EC/Uh10W5euKpdl1u+Yy7eBBcZNOOT4bw7YLYMPA1Cb22kzkWX0S69n Gt3BFTZSbqSw1+epNTt8ZH7tI6oCwr5qsW3TpO67ffn0EY0dZ10k+SKp3YVuqaYGsiEh 1ldJrACLM0U4HCwpOMsz8FgdvK4ka+NzrvzbeqJPjKdVQ8kce81D8Z3ZHR6NqICSHTRw QeFQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVQZ0drSmWxY0rCaavRB4Is2nPINLLAuLKymqJrBzb7NQ/gPSLT qfdHaZzOuUPpwMuJuEtnUEO81iZwcytUP0qOkSc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyotNufNTbMaxCuluZU6vH1t746qANAqgTTib2HWhyDOlgyA5FcNu5iVBLHoiEQD0Az25FySGsuSC1TzbR4vaw=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:7491:: with SMTP id n17mr6256935uap.102.1564083344896; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:35:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALjsk164zz+nDy5ZmOhvCscBQrBNMKTW0fz7Zxy=KtVx+ktz+Q@mail.gmail.com> <20190725191746.GB12596@ubuntu-dmitri>
In-Reply-To: <20190725191746.GB12596@ubuntu-dmitri>
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 20:35:34 +0100
Message-ID: <CALGR9ob33Gaf2BP2i3Oo1hL=wPNQEpGOn_5tkCDtxamrnq=kdg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brad Lassey <lassey@chromium.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002bf577058e8688d9"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::931; envelope-from=lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com; helo=mail-ua1-x931.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.555, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1hqjX4-0003hP-6c 610ed80a3e4a0835fddeb357ce9a570a
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Setting to disable HTTP/2 Priorities
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CALGR9ob33Gaf2BP2i3Oo1hL=wPNQEpGOn_5tkCDtxamrnq=kdg@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/36839
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hey Dmitri,


On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 8:21 PM Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>;
wrote:

> From the draft:
>
> " 3.  The SETTINGS_ENABLE_HTTP2_PRIORITIES SETTINGS Parameter
> "
> "    This document adds a new SETTINGS parameter to those defined by
> "    [RFC7540], Section 6.5.2.
> "
> "    The new parameter name is SETTINGS_ENABLE_HTTP2_PRIORITIES.
>
> Including "HTTP2" in the name is superfluous:  Since this is an
> HTTP/2 setting, it deals with HTTP/2 priorities.
>

I agree with your observation


> Or was "HTTP2" added to the name to differentiate it from possible
> future priority mechanisms?  In that case, I suggest s/HTTP2/RFC7540/
>

My observation is that WG is using a range of terms to refer to

* HTTP/2's tree-based priority model
* signalled using HTTP/2 frames
* HTTP/3's HTTP/2-inspired-tree-based priority model
* signalled using HTTP/3 frames

Refining these terms would help in generak IMO, and would probably get
reflected back into the name of this setting.

Lucas