Progress on Cookies
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 22 February 2016 04:31 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B365D1B29C9 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 20:31:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CXKqj_jPAZ0s for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 20:31:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 107651B2AED for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 20:31:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1aXi7U-0001Gb-OB for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 04:29:12 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 04:29:12 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1aXi7U-0001Gb-OB@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1aXi7Q-0001Fu-G8 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 04:29:08 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1aXi7O-0002cW-Ol for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 04:29:07 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.101] (unknown [120.149.194.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5CE3522E260; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 23:28:42 -0500 (EST)
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 15:28:41 +1100
Message-Id: <66982527-0202-48B7-BF2C-19DA57B9CF6E@mnot.net>
Cc: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
To: HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.359, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1aXi7O-0002cW-Ol 1a50b47194cfa95619ef801250976741
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Progress on Cookies
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/66982527-0202-48B7-BF2C-19DA57B9CF6E@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31086
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
At this point, I think we've seen enough interest to adopt the following two documents: * https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-west-leave-secure-cookies-alone * https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-west-cookie-prefixes Mike, are you willing to continue to edit those as WG documents? As a reminder, the intent here is to identify a set of documents describing concrete changes to RFC6265; once we have consensus on their contents, we'll incorporate them and go to LC. To get there, we need to see: 1) review of the two specs above to assure that they're suitable for incorporation into 6265, and 2) any other changes that people would like to see, ideally expressed as Internet-Drafts We'll have the documents in the WG repo shortly; in the meantime, you can create and see issues here: https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/labels/6265bis If you have ideas for other changes, please get them to the WG ASAP; I'd like to have a substantial discussion of Cookie-related things in B-A. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
- Progress on Cookies Mark Nottingham
- Re: Progress on Cookies Mike West