Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 02 December 2022 21:42 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69827C14CE2B for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 13:42:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmx.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d5Zp09NJ62hW for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 13:42:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A96AAC14CE26 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 13:42:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1p1DnO-00AN0d-Rd for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2022 21:42:10 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2022 21:42:10 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1p1DnO-00AN0d-Rd@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1p1DnM-00AMzL-QX for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2022 21:42:08 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1p1DnL-004LVz-6e for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2022 21:42:08 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.de; s=s31663417; t=1670017309; bh=80RRctKiecI5gMyHssUIJBDLejTFxzE28wl0pKst3r0=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=MTAGrnVINPDLslOQtpeeZoBeBroB44uvFBsHFZ5VcvDpxT+RGPYL1FXclvybqy2Zn 2uAN64ybuRpEjixrKtRjHBMvQIfQdgSR1ceg8/kH8boKoHxoHSi1wDAhG1K9UYKLJQ vXxg1GD0b7t0Wy4zOhbiu2k8Sb7x6JjIfhms6gCqnxEw5TFZdzPro3Nnv/3DeYmPxE 1FVuTzcLjJG80OJMy1gbdJTyQnRxlv+INiYI82XJlEACwrdsukJaXd7YOCBoL5REsW kIsTyYNKKONSxnpqo7IftkwCURTueVTPhGMpXT118+So7pqyG98sT1Yp8XZYHN8NOZ 0cP5CXHretgbA==
X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([217.251.128.99]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MnJhO-1oc1zV0QLc-00jJst; Fri, 02 Dec 2022 22:41:49 +0100
Message-ID: <65070e79-5429-a4cd-abe2-667b526badf1@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2022 22:41:44 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <2070c8e0-98d6-7b63-77c3-550bcd661397@gmx.de> <202212011735.2B1HZYgm004808@critter.freebsd.dk> <e580db7e-c0ec-0f1a-17af-5719ab09468c@gmx.de> <202212020810.2B28ALnL004331@critter.freebsd.dk> <eee5a787-da37-feb1-098a-7d2d9c0f1d37@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <202212020848.2B28mGbc004600@critter.freebsd.dk> <4e251954-afb6-fa08-616c-db95e23ad1fd@gmx.de> <202212020946.2B29kSe6004829@critter.freebsd.dk> <75dad0c0-e3bb-1189-0c16-e8275d3879ff@gmx.de> <202212021016.2B2AGvEP004972@critter.freebsd.dk> <9990b393-93ff-75af-4e14-de4f6ba3366c@gmx.de> <7b7f714d-890e-db90-4922-cfbc46b3e999@gmx.de> <202212021129.2B2BTY9f005362@critter.freebsd.dk> <b1d3af79-373f-a9af-7ff9-39f5f44915f0@gmx.de> <202212021214.2B2CEUQx005654@critter.freebsd.dk> <7a93fa17-38fe-5fa8-54ed-a726ab9d5a39@gmx.de> <841DC85E-F936-4350-A74F-170D22E6ADCE@gbiv.com> <202212021918.2B2JIBHC007228@critter.freebsd.dk>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <202212021918.2B2JIBHC007228@critter.freebsd.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:EKTDerXHeVmL6okEPiWsQtF27RkfifpsXJSagelSZhYG3p/buUF KAH1htTE25DNmqXzBbqLPyhnuSHSdhZoYb0u6FxETZPRB26zY5L/CCCeUgsLGPkCBipZWnQ 5oyuPEZUslWY9SCEo9OvSJGd5BqTnFIQlAmY/7gS3G7GAt3ahsmlp3W2G2OrDPPKPQHJNa1 uEkkHSQfbNvIEqdQJJVbA==
UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:xjTiwMJBi2A=;pv5zsNDnpLJrbWK2Ie++jeE0ges kwkGVcifWNB0bIZre3hTfOoqefZoJoRVbE3eSoeAmr6pLJNoToXFm/9FIakfGyzwlrP+sXjcx sice+IZjjjEBG5lr+RAgdiZmwaMTX7S9vXguVf3RJ0H/Yypykhqs8TClP0BcLPt+iDMDO8/KI KWsrGDqpp3BDSUhQ/ZThgbQBkEQpHdkGEBM68s5VpdWboS2qlLF6OHtPKXxxU5eJiQPzMlahv Pj83YNMpQgg5aXNlgayz0bzARPJWTMv0cKWm0tACueWDz6GAcahmTTsVZwaj/4bCrn921L5Tf tlyPR1N7nB8sqdqrYboigLaANulCvXcBKVd61p1zREe1cLaEprht5tMawb2+G5S7yzDnBrbc0 +K5PpTvJ3bKLkQsWy4dwKbgwpZS+DxiQoktDlwdeKjNhyIT5TgO357EKANB8AW+neC8GuuVCu s/csorLxW0O7ghZ6Uuh+ncSxEGXloSO1EcpFaemU5EdeU/iwSiHZBfOgZcnV0cxQcwy8eWTX0 fyo7iqh0wsUx+vyXd1Y0xVDq4IL9+HCHoEG1v0iJhLLWb7goAs4MaiTtYIsX07FvOax6lM1zS 03oPFTZ2Tfc2/mSRcCGI8ZXX6+43TPqR8Jkd2jSZjIbZW9M6fKcnGPVf/otT7QyQ/9rnE/RiW gXIoyKIyad6cSOgm1lENwVx/5lnwmPg/CGFbEWuBIjHLLkNSH8UJdxTrpZ7tqopKjtt8fiIJv 4yrzIQ6RuYbMwb/sgpHiLRdysjnm2s8FFnVWPK2dH+S6LRucFHgzlVdzijNSxnArssUg1EDyH 2pqjWj6SR3VAhTT8M+YscbEdfO7AGoMj0pOjJTcHQ24aDpt4nzEoqXAzNWhqKtDSeXWeNv7CY eyEx6cNO0+X46tXQaWCFbeklCZtYB6DGBihzKLRqtrCLmixIfFq/ds65HQGFGsZ+V9IhmLr0/ RLKBwWLmpEe1mUySfH6QbxfhGNk=
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.15.19; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=julian.reschke@gmx.de domain=gmx.de), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.258, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1p1DnL-004LVz-6e c0b984ee20105c24a0e5650d32a20b36
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/65070e79-5429-a4cd-abe2-667b526badf1@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/40630
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On 02.12.2022 20:18, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > -------- > Roy T. Fielding writes: > >> FWIW, there is nothing technical preventing a requirement that sf fields >> support UTF-8 by default. > > (... provided they are somehow escaped into USASCII visibility.) > > Yes, and I have absolutely no problem with SF being used to transport > UTF-8, X.509, BJSON or LU6.2 that way, that is literally why I put > sf-binary in: To make it easy for people to move /any/ binary data, > but at the same time trying to stop them from inventing their own > obscure escaping mechanisms. > > But none of the data SF serializes or parses have /semantic/ meaning > at the layer in the cake where SF lives, and that is not by accident: > > For me it was an explicit design goal, that SF would be totally > unaware of Code-Tables, UniCode, Mime, Country-codes, TLDs, Timezones > and all other time-variant registries of human policy or fashion. > ... So why are revising the spec then to add sf-date??? Best regards, Julian
- signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Martin J. Dürst
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Poul-Henning Kamp
- support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures… Julian Reschke
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Julian Reschke
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Julian Reschke
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Julian Reschke
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Julian Reschke
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Julian Reschke
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Carsten Bormann
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Justin Richer
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Roy T. Fielding
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Roy T. Fielding
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Justin Richer
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Julian Reschke
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Mark Nottingham
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Julian Reschke
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Julian Reschke
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Mark Nottingham
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Julian Reschke
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Willy Tarreau
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Julian Reschke
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Julian Reschke
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Mark Nottingham
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Lucas Pardue
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Lucas Pardue
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Mark Nottingham
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Lucas Pardue
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Mark Nottingham
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Mark Nottingham
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Watson Ladd
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Watson Ladd
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke