I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-retrofit-03.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Wed, 25 May 2022 06:49 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA2F5C14F6E5 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2022 23:49:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.652
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.652 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PSQ3mzNpjLZP for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2022 23:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A156C14F692 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2022 23:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1ntknH-0005K7-Qt for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 25 May 2022 06:46:55 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 06:46:55 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1ntknH-0005K7-Qt@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <internet-drafts@ietf.org>) id 1ntknF-0005It-QX for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 25 May 2022 06:46:53 +0000
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <internet-drafts@ietf.org>) id 1ntknE-0001N5-Dq for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 25 May 2022 06:46:53 +0000
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E0ADC14F716; Tue, 24 May 2022 23:46:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 8.3.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Reply-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <165346120063.21466.102140814382566942@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 23:46:40 -0700
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=50.223.129.194; envelope-from=internet-drafts@ietf.org; helo=mail.ietf.org
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, W3C_NW=1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1ntknE-0001N5-Dq 875a9c569851b2c2cba8603551fea7b2
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-retrofit-03.txt
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/165346120063.21466.102140814382566942@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/40038
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the HTTP WG of the IETF.
Title : Retrofit Structured Fields for HTTP
Author : Mark Nottingham
Filename : draft-ietf-httpbis-retrofit-03.txt
Pages : 14
Date : 2022-05-24
Abstract:
This specification nominates a selection of existing HTTP fields as
having syntax that is compatible with Structured Fields, so that they
can be handled as such (subject to certain caveats).
To accommodate some additional fields whose syntax is not compatible,
it also defines mappings of their semantics into new Structured
Fields. It does not specify how to negotiate their use.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-retrofit/
There is also an HTML version available at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-httpbis-retrofit-03.html
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-retrofit-03
Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-retrofit-03.txt internet-drafts