Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8586 (5704)

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Thu, 25 April 2019 23:26 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B761A12004B for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 16:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=VUR4YnWX; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Y+KZGiJm
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nRFL3ADGIdO2 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 16:25:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3891F120077 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 16:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1hJniL-0002n0-FD for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 23:23:37 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 23:23:37 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1hJniL-0002n0-FD@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4c]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1hJniJ-0002m1-Bl for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 23:23:35 +0000
Received: from wnew1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.26]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1hJniH-0001MW-M6 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 23:23:35 +0000
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailnew.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F600685; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 19:23:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 25 Apr 2019 19:23:09 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=h 3s+Nrd+Lb7kKT65NmQvaUTZ5t+fJ4ZvIyAh76Zu7u4=; b=VUR4YnWXYrkgCMROJ gGfWn6DOlvmY5DNlcrSoLDmoXB5cWVHCbMd2+p11YBqoxVOoEaCv4WIkPle3ejl9 5o1PICA1u808nwG8XtOe0y2BejzHyjRm2mmeTSNiJOOoc3P+8WxuB+9g3AWmWdL1 KOGBaySMD81gAoERV4p5OMi8L/RtqSHS/pWwsS5msQxzT7efWIjZLp5R0VcK845k k0alyXfdcrgZZORHu7FuCKFz/sJyauyraK00ArFmHtWxdmS/8AXBQU+lx2d/3UmS rtrCbQJIFyoCjywKbIjjcs577RVJqZ5jW2LV6U5KJ2p3XyXh3Prvqu863VMMhmgL YSZdg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=h3s+Nrd+Lb7kKT65NmQvaUTZ5t+fJ4ZvIyAh76Zu7 u4=; b=Y+KZGiJmdnbf/LvX05uSjbkXm4rZ0+8KWIA6kHXeJ6+abvTs1kdE+jnZS u3urZ9A3bKQ8PJyB5ZST7RJVGBWv1WJxKVsJLJdizqstOXg3aLausbypYJBzfyTR taQ8z/nBekdSXJdF6kCHyaHBphBtferqv6+KP2Gq5MKzSTZszOL5N1MFVvHGSzCT 655NRa+xqwdG1YBQH8SRu9BLObH0hJmGKGCMo45YmiYTSyRMQq1rCwsnhRjNNku3 lsHjXDq63g0J74OCiPO3kyxBB4uElhUahnd+LX82Ay5fyREOri6NEFcyz9mVcZ50 RpKn5GS4z24z0pONu4yCqexkh0rVQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:WkHCXIY5iWHzcFMtILujHFDwUVZ1NPmGLiJFVv5BXXfUhhTzvTGFFQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrheehgddvudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrkhcu pfhothhtihhnghhhrghmuceomhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpe hrfhgtqdgvughithhorhdrohhrghdpmhhnohhtrdhnvghtnecukfhppedugeegrddufeei rddujeehrddvkeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnh gvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:WkHCXNBl74g00vl8H6gTXBOMuU6WDz_atV-ny0eDPH6g2fWXkHE_Qw> <xmx:WkHCXGahjMuP40P5NTAUw73r6yw3waHF16hbgWLFDjxDtcSekBkM4w> <xmx:WkHCXJg88q8jkau3Yz9PCfhcO6emCY7WM-7RMQyk0ArXGXr0hBicAw> <xmx:XEHCXM34_Dh6DWqOZd3PqhU-e3IyXxGvRN3Sqiy8JcGVwgb7sjXPIJMsliM>
Received: from attitudadjuster.mnot.net (unknown [144.136.175.28]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 079D2103D3; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 19:23:02 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <20190425134158.E023DB8207F@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 09:22:59 +1000
Cc: "Ludin, Stephen" <sludin@akamai.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@fastly.com>, Nick Sullivan <nick@cloudflare.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, adam@nostrum.com, Patrick McManus <patrick.ducksong@gmail.com>, tpauly@apple.com, "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BB81FB2C-F7E1-46DF-B98E-0A8E00269D39@mnot.net>
References: <20190425134158.E023DB8207F@rfc-editor.org>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.8)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.26; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=wnew1-smtp.messagingengine.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=3.554, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1hJniH-0001MW-M6 a777bc6da74c0e30e16cdc491e98fe55
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8586 (5704)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/BB81FB2C-F7E1-46DF-B98E-0A8E00269D39@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/36563
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Confirmed.

> On 25 Apr 2019, at 11:41 pm, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8586,
> "Loop Detection in Content Delivery Networks (CDNs)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5704
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
> 
> Section: 1.2
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>   This specification uses the Augmented Backus-Naur Form (ABNF)
>   notation of [RFC5234] with a list extension, defined in Section 7 of
>   [RFC7230], that allows for compact definition of comma-separated
>   lists using a '#' operator (similar to how the '*' operator indicates
>   repetition).  Additionally, it uses a token (OWS), uri-host, and port
>   rules from [RFC7230] and the parameter rule from [RFC7231].
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>   This specification uses the Augmented Backus-Naur Form (ABNF)
>   notation of [RFC5234] with a list extension, defined in Section 7 of
>   [RFC7230], that allows for compact definition of comma-separated
>   lists using a '#' operator (similar to how the '*' operator indicates
>   repetition).  Additionally, it uses the token, OWS, uri-host and port
>   rules from [RFC7230] and the parameter rule from [RFC7231].
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The last sentence apparently was mangled during AUTH48. The correct version is from draft-ietf-httpbis-cdn-loop-02. "token", "OWS", "uri-host" and "port" are all ABNF rules.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8586 (draft-ietf-httpbis-cdn-loop-02)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Loop Detection in Content Delivery Networks (CDNs)
> Publication Date    : April 2019
> Author(s)           : S. Ludin, M. Nottingham, N. Sullivan
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis
> Area                : Applications and Real-Time
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/