Re: Call for adoption: draft-reschke-httpauth-auth-info-00

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 02 February 2015 13:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ietf.org@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E391D1A19F6 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 05:46:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oXZ4JpnmFgEv for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 05:46:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 810081A039C for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 05:46:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1YIHH8-0006ii-Iv for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 13:42:50 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 13:42:50 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1YIHH8-0006ii-Iv@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1YIHGy-0006h4-LG for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 13:42:40 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1YIHGx-0004yz-QG for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 13:42:40 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.26] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LqylH-1Xmm041J5P-00eYqL; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 14:41:59 +0100
Message-ID: <54CF7E9B.2060700@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 14:41:47 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <1BA93C83-91E9-4E7D-88CE-ADC8C39091C6@mnot.net> <CABkgnnXhg55e5N2O8yZJpTbz4qSm0-KpVApyDha_snetrFqvMw@mail.gmail.com> <54C9E419.1070407@greenbytes.de> <54CB7A4F.7090402@crf.canon.fr> <54CB7F48.4060800@gmx.de> <CAGL6epLUkFi6amhExWASqjS5Mvs1MVTJ1hDmhBTncznQV1GK1A@mail.gmail.com> <54CBFB6E.9070800@treenet.co.nz>
In-Reply-To: <54CBFB6E.9070800@treenet.co.nz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:7/LW+kiXqGkkLOupYcVdj/73q3j1FPKned2qGSCLDkjnZQr6Pqu d9/VjXgUkG8UgjG6JWJkR/wm0bFCsfxrA1OHXFZxlzQ4GLpRXU5yESkVgQ5besYkPehcdUr LeoJH/WUwBr4ADPlEZ2t4SmujRLG3pFuAdWyNkdYQ6rcoeg/9rUzCmuWvmCp82nLk1zvygT gRtp1cIDRDbe5sWFqh2Vw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.15.18; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.388, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1YIHGx-0004yz-QG 1266da91a9ff9fd40aeee9eb29c64643
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call for adoption: draft-reschke-httpauth-auth-info-00
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/54CF7E9B.2060700@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/28741
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2015-01-30 22:45, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 31/01/2015 3:11 a.m., Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote:
>> Why would we restrict the use of this header in future protocols based on
>> the Digest usage of this header?
>> What would be the harm in allowing the new protocol that uses the header to
>> restrict it usage?
>>
>
> Information leaks. User credentials and secure token are potentially
> stored in here, as are details specific to the internal operation of the
> security algorithm selected/negotiated.
> ...

The intent of the draft was to separate out what was defined in RFC 
2617; thus I agree that we shouldn't relax the use unless there's broad 
consensus that that would be a good idea.

Best regards, Julian