IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Discussion of 9.2.2

"Martin Nilsson" <nilsson@opera.com> Sun, 28 September 2014 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E3F11A1B7F for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:57:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.687
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.687 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ICFkuT4W91cC for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:57:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9153B1A0371 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:57:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1XYIfy-00075g-B4 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 17:54:26 +0000
Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 17:54:26 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1XYIfy-00075g-B4@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <nilsson@opera.com>) id 1XYIfP-000732-Qz for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 17:53:51 +0000
Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com ([209.85.212.174]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <nilsson@opera.com>) id 1XYIfO-0002jJ-P6 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 17:53:51 +0000
Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id hi2so1934666wib.1 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:53:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:to:cc:subject:references:date :mime-version:from:organization:message-id:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=2E/pokF9eeNsK3LawkkSWaRTJ0SvlMO/WnmJhPpqIiQ=; b=cW+FBlRBddREiqgpvicxXLHHQ6Ty53acb0LcaJmfswdZI8UcNGZuU763Bna23fNb5N vGN0zjLYxwOy6ip5ZFXfOg3yhNRqU0JIGlo47XV8sovzIpknih8MmctFAx6vCRv6dJZM ib/jFlq5Q3/mPx0hOqH/CIfR5qzVeK54s7wxbBBEYqjySOhYaJoCwpN5+vKL79d3xp3k 7FGDHZGxNFjzfbIIyB+FoiMK4+qK0H1ng3T0fHJLOw3kO23nayTnboRVuIHhSxr6jFw5 Znn6pBWBVoTBSN6on3mdRNcQ08ovotgW7PZS/H/Nx+LDKk01H77knwUYVav5+QkA3Yyl gb8A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlzILE5j6XG16AXFqzy05mgQE330RRZq2Zjh2iZH2xgY+spZoA4Qq1L5O5rUxfBnLXoPi4V
X-Received: by 10.180.80.198 with SMTP id t6mr42811096wix.6.1411926803950; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:53:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from beryllium.oslo.osa (c-151ce353.03-25-6c6b7010.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se. [83.227.28.21]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f7sm9145108wix.22.2014.09.28.10.53.22 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:53:23 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------TnmkgOzmPTCTxIz0MEFgLd"
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <F0D4BA2A-46B2-4F1A-8A23-1A319A3E5FC0@mnot.net> <CABkgnnWszVer8Y3qgmEQnxNKUhroUEeseC8JkBbGT2P6z3iZxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAH_y2NEvsTaZQpfAajycuo9xqKqd3Pu9aCtVGZLZez7Ux=p+Yw@mail.gmail.com> <op.xmurz3mxiw9drz@uranium.sthat4.btopenzone.com> <CAH_y2NGo8XtqH=g=8hx3Uf-JQfpsAaVsefyQoC02Yo9X4bX8jA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 19:53:21 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Martin Nilsson <nilsson@opera.com>
Organization: Opera Software ASA
Message-ID: <op.xmwry7asiw9drz@beryllium.oslo.osa>
In-Reply-To: <CAH_y2NGo8XtqH=g=8hx3Uf-JQfpsAaVsefyQoC02Yo9X4bX8jA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.17 (Win32)
Received-SPF: permerror client-ip=209.85.212.174; envelope-from=nilsson@opera.com; helo=mail-wi0-f174.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.818, BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1XYIfO-0002jJ-P6 47fbbf7336346db1f098d7568988e83f
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Discussion of 9.2.2
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/op.xmwry7asiw9drz@beryllium.oslo.osa>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/27305
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 04:12:08 +0200, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote:

>
> On 28 September 2014 01:58, Martin Nilsson <nilsson@opera.com> wrote:
>> Do you believe we will intentionally release a new cipher that isn't  
>> strong enough to be acceptable for HTTP/2? If no, then there isn't a  
>> problem >>here.
>
> That is not the failure mode that we have been talking about.
> It is not that the new keys are likely to be weak.  It is in fact  
> because they are almost certainly going to be strong, but might not  
> match the 9.2.2 >description of what a strong cipher is.

Either a new cipher will match the 9.2.2 criteria of strong key, and there  
is no problem, or it does not match, we state in text that it is also  
allowed for http/2, and there is no problem.

/Martin Nilsson

-- 
Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status