Re: HTTP/2 examples SHOULD use :authority

Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org> Thu, 01 December 2016 18:09 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F10129781 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 10:09:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.797
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.797 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XmYiDeeauxsL for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 10:09:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8ED6212969E for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 10:09:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cCVjk-0006iJ-Pr for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 18:05:36 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 18:05:36 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cCVjk-0006iJ-Pr@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <khurtta@welho.com>) id 1cCVjc-0006g6-Ez for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 18:05:28 +0000
Received: from welho-filter4.welho.com ([83.102.41.26]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <khurtta@welho.com>) id 1cCVjU-0004Ni-6N for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 18:05:23 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by welho-filter4.welho.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97F518F77; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 20:04:51 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at pp.htv.fi
Received: from welho-smtp3.welho.com ([IPv6:::ffff:83.102.41.86]) by localhost (welho-filter4.welho.com [::ffff:83.102.41.26]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OekBHHrTLoQm; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 20:04:51 +0200 (EET)
Received: from hurtta09lk.keh.iki.fi (89-27-35-245.bb.dnainternet.fi [89.27.35.245]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by welho-smtp3.welho.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7BF72313; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 20:04:50 +0200 (EET)
In-Reply-To: <4ea740d1-1df8-5a76-5198-dfd45b46955e@measurement-factory.com>
References: <4ea740d1-1df8-5a76-5198-dfd45b46955e@measurement-factory.com>
To: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 20:04:50 +0200 (EET)
Sender: hurtta@hurtta09lk.keh.iki.fi
From: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
CC: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
X-Mailer: ELM [version ME+ 2.5 PLalpha44]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-Id: <20161201180451.E97F518F77@welho-filter4.welho.com>
Received-SPF: none client-ip=83.102.41.26; envelope-from=khurtta@welho.com; helo=welho-filter4.welho.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.947, BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1cCVjU-0004Ni-6N 727ba8b12be56d0a4de6a343c52153a0
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: HTTP/2 examples SHOULD use :authority
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20161201180451.E97F518F77@welho-filter4.welho.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33069
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7540#section-8.1.2.3

|   o  The ":authority" pseudo-header field includes the authority
|      portion of the target URI ([RFC3986], Section 3.2).  The authority
|      MUST NOT include the deprecated "userinfo" subcomponent for "http"
|      or "https" schemed URIs.
|
|      To ensure that the HTTP/1.1 request line can be reproduced
|      accurately, this pseudo-header field MUST be omitted when
|      translating from an HTTP/1.1 request that has a request target in
|      origin or asterisk form (see [RFC7230], Section 5.3). 


There is "MUST be omitted"

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230#section-5.3.1

| 5.3.1.  origin-form
| 
|   The most common form of request-target is the origin-form.
|
|     origin-form    = absolute-path [ "?" query ]


> Do you think the RFC examples should use ":authority" instead of "host"?

There should be "native" http/2 only examples also. 

Now these are HTTP/1.1 to HTTP/2 conversion examples,
where ":authority" is not allowed.

/ Kari Hurtta