Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns

Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Sat, 13 July 2013 19:15 UTC

Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 19:15:16 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Uy5Ho-0006Bh-FQ@frink.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 21:14:42 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: Mark Delany <s2y@romeo.emu.st>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20130713191442.GO32054@1wt.eu>
References: <CABkgnnXeqD6wh0dcJ1Dz=4PLAJNkDeGcCuzMr9ATd_7xS7nbGQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7RbcUkLf3CTAB4jwicnsiKWLGVY6=hX0k=0256SR_gcVt9A@mail.gmail.com> <092D65A8-8CB7-419D-B6A4-77CAE40A0026@gmail.com> <3835.1373612286@critter.freebsd.dk> <CD9E163F-1225-4DA8-9982-8BDBD16B1051@mnot.net> <1772.1373629495@critter.freebsd.dk> <20130712125628.GC28893@1wt.eu> <881777F8-86A7-4943-9BBD-8EB2DC306834@gmail.com> <20130713182902.69380.qmail@f5-external.bushwire.net> <6823.1373741311@critter.freebsd.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6823.1373741311@critter.freebsd.dk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=62.212.114.60; envelope-from=w@1wt.eu; helo=1wt.eu
Subject: Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20130713191442.GO32054@1wt.eu>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list

On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 06:48:31PM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> It could actually be interesting if somebody would go through their
> HTTP/1.1 traffic and estimate how much bandwidth would be saved.

On most static servers (ie most of the round trips for loading a page),
it will actually *inflate* the traffic since we normally don't send
cookies there, but with the proposal, I suppose the session ID will be
sent anyway (or we need at least one bit to indicate its presence).

Willy

HTTP router point-of-view concerns Christian Parpart
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Amos Jeffries
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Roberto Peon
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Amos Jeffries
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Christian Parpart
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Amos Jeffries
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Michael Sweet
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Martin Thomson
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns James M Snell
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Sam Pullara
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Roberto Peon
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Roberto Peon
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Amos Jeffries
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Sam Pullara
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Patrick McManus
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Roberto Peon
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns James M Snell
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Roberto Peon
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns James M Snell
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Roberto Peon
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Sam Pullara
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Roberto Peon
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Martin Thomson
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Mark Nottingham
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Mike Belshe
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Gábor Molnár
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Gábor Molnár
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Michael Sweet
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Christian Parpart
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Willy Tarreau
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Patrick McManus
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Jeff Pinner
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Martin Thomson
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Roberto Peon
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Ludin, Stephen
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Roberto Peon
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns James M Snell
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Amos Jeffries
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Amos Jeffries
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Roberto Peon
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Yoav Nir
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Willy Tarreau
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Willy Tarreau
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Sam Pullara
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Willy Tarreau
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Mark Delany
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Willy Tarreau
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Willy Tarreau
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Willy Tarreau
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Yoav Nir
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Yoav Nir
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Willy Tarreau
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Stephen Farrell
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Willy Tarreau
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Sam Pullara
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Nicolas Mailhot
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Nicolas Mailhot
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Nicolas Mailhot
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Martin Nilsson
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Nico Williams
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Nico Williams
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Nico Williams
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns Nico Williams