Re: Call for Adoption: draft-fielding-http-key
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 19 October 2015 05:12 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FEE41A1B4E for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 22:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AwR6iNgQiV7q for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 22:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 844021A1B48 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 22:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Zo2gr-0000AC-6U for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 05:08:57 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 05:08:57 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Zo2gr-0000AC-6U@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1Zo2gm-00009Q-Am for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 05:08:52 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1Zo2gk-0003C8-BL for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 05:08:51 +0000
Received: from [192.168.0.136] (unknown [120.149.147.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2DFA922E1F4; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 01:08:25 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <EFF24778-0AF9-40AF-AB08-85367FEB527A@mnot.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 16:08:21 +1100
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D6C315AA-6D67-40A9-96EA-DF8F9B192B95@mnot.net>
References: <EFF24778-0AF9-40AF-AB08-85367FEB527A@mnot.net>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.323, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1Zo2gk-0003C8-BL 9e1ee99a8db7e6c5fa05dd293b9794b1
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: draft-fielding-http-key
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/D6C315AA-6D67-40A9-96EA-DF8F9B192B95@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/30377
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
I've chatted to Martin about this, and he agrees that we have consensus to adopt. I'll try to get the doc submitted by the cutoff. Cheers, > On 1 Oct 2015, at 3:22 pm, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > We discussed this document in Dallas: > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fielding-http-key> > ... as well as on and off since then. > > Based on the feedback received and after discussion with our Area Director, I believe that we should adopt this document as a WG product, with a target of Proposed Standard. > > Since I'm an author on the document, I've asked Martin Thomson to be Document Shepherd, to help judge consensus both of the CfA and during the document's LC, should we adopt it. He has graciously agreed. > > Please comment on-list; we’ll make a decision about adoption at the end of next week. The result of this CfA will also help us determine how to go forward with the Client Hints document. > > Regards, > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
- Call for Adoption: draft-fielding-http-key Mark Nottingham
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-fielding-http-key Amos Jeffries
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-fielding-http-key Julian Reschke
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-fielding-http-key Yoav Weiss
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-fielding-http-key Leif Hedstrom
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-fielding-http-key Willy Tarreau
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-fielding-http-key Ilya Grigorik
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-fielding-http-key Mark Nottingham