IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Live Byte Ranges

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 23 November 2016 09:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D3CC129462 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 01:10:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SzhtnwQXtV4w for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 01:10:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C30512945B for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 01:10:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1c9TVO-0005rs-9t for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:06:14 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:06:14 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1c9TVO-0005rs-9t@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1c9TVD-0005pt-FF for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:06:03 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1c9TV7-00046o-9R for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:05:58 +0000
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([93.217.109.81]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MPDaC-1c53dk2BOa-004Pc7; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:05:24 +0100
To: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <CAOdDvNrrLfh0yV4UdBN_HpHNfD024Kufibe3D4ZB1N-SqYVt4g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <20e8301d-b972-37e1-dd0d-2cfba0902637@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:05:23 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOdDvNrrLfh0yV4UdBN_HpHNfD024Kufibe3D4ZB1N-SqYVt4g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:O0qwv6bhumi/RZnBezVYcUAdq1b/kApylFh0EwDtKGS70CrReoK Opvdc+KjxgbnArnD8/G2tI9rUc1ms5eIMUokSrPxFg08lcvarFpGzEJKpwDWA7eB6owUn17 yTRp6LPoSsbXQ/5jnZOeoygXdFUXJNC3P/tZ9libN4HABJZB7tC+tuUDGAHrqwtAvbb83bW uZNGqFwyb8yKszrvDqhow==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:M10qAkoCADw=:WckPVxHwQtwCMdEpNzc4lA 0eApMi9Y4DZ4gaOI69OYAIYRDF/pwiL/uWPVG3dAWNEfJsgG7IMiPJTDr6/5sZ3tpAyOTlDpC untKNKmvG/9IMObDDIwN2+lOBcFig5u0Wjn/7tiBOXxvq2dyS5cAskelFeVaxRIF2Sb6+ZS9g WT3rS/0hTZBZc0aDoWXDCWrDrGwmV1uan24kG+Cy0pjB9Witb4vxbSqjbnBuxwLrDSktH/kMH aB7Xf36lYdBf2cRfunk23RCVad5kQWEYBaTw10XXePDtO9bo1EHJEtd6eAuDzdhM6x51tc683 oKtitM+tFR48E6C9PtM03ZAKt26G8NXcB1urA9gHMpqecd7CzRQSBQbxwmXl7mT0Pjd4smc3o MjpiHbjEYExXo9Sicj9Ukx8IDXWunGpB7rMMx7I3E3bQw3MRlPP3hjLocQgC2UIbz+hF/oLsa qeYz5XYOU3r5wJhs42DSdSAxAsVsnN8c2cKjwffRyuzM8+4vSs644V9BkqEnSBCLuW82gFUYj SEMkeXIUtK5oU1thlyvZdo98vWrOrBHP7UunxtICeEqTAg49+ENQqYpMyyMeQ/QwA4bP5Vyo3 FrMSPI20Vr7LwUGMJCXZ31/sTE+gZAowz5dmdDtldGWs2QFJ/P78g7ahtGCAiGD7qMl/IoCYG D7LKPdwb+AxL3ig2zrLtpAHb1CY6lblZ3g9Xfbup9FH499RfdZVjEL2QzScHFzqARZgxJtTNv +qXLy1WvnR7he6/29JxYnpkgPNG6q7LV+Gky8+T0ELVZ/PUKq64vwzPdfAGD38Vf4EQgRQQnO kGbxP5II0wUg0DKUYNZVD6vJtAAZg==
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.15.18; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.025, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1c9TV7-00046o-9R 96d81c141247a1ae47a9af70f938f116
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Live Byte Ranges
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20e8301d-b972-37e1-dd0d-2cfba0902637@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32968
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2016-11-22 23:38, Patrick McManus wrote:
> Dear HTTPbis denizens,
>
> As I did with the 103-proposal, I have a request to the working group
> implementors to offer a sign of their interest or opposition to the
> Random Access and Live Content draft and presentation that we talked
> about in Seoul[*]
>
> To summarize briefly - this addresses the problem of addressing byte
> ranges of dynamic (growing) content. A number of solutions have seen
> false starts in this space previously, but this one has a shot at being
> compatible with existing infrastructure.

Where "this one" IMHO is only one of the options mentioned in 
<https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-pratt-httpbis-rand-access-live-00.txt>.

> This was published quite close to the meeting, and while the chairs had
> the sense people generally really liked the solution it also seemed as
> if not everyone had the chance to get familiar with it. Please do so
> with this thread!
>
> Particular comments on the draft are welcome here, as are general
> comments along the line of "that would be good for the ecosystem" or
> "omg - I can't stomach that because <<>>". If there is enough interest
> we'll proceed with a CFA.

"That would be good for the ecosystem" :-)

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email