I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-key-00.txt

internet-drafts@ietf.org Mon, 19 October 2015 05:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EEBE1A1B48 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 22:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6_KtlcFojgqc for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 22:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 844321A1B4A for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 22:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Zo2he-0000BQ-1B for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 05:09:46 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 05:09:46 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Zo2he-0000BQ-1B@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <internet-drafts@ietf.org>) id 1Zo2ha-0000Aa-Nw for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 05:09:42 +0000
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <internet-drafts@ietf.org>) id 1Zo2hY-0003Cs-0J for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 05:09:41 +0000
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7500B1A1B51 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 22:09:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 39f9NIGznHzz; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 22:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41D1B1A1B49; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 22:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.6.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Message-ID: <20151019050912.29680.27486.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 22:09:12 -0700
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=4.31.198.44; envelope-from=internet-drafts@ietf.org; helo=mail.ietf.org
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.287, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1Zo2hY-0003Cs-0J b4a2c5ba7f82339e4a1aac56332570f1
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-key-00.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20151019050912.29680.27486.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/30378
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
 This draft is a work item of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol Working Group of the IETF.

        Title           : The Key HTTP Response Header Field
        Authors         : Roy T. Fielding
                          Mark Nottingham
	Filename        : draft-ietf-httpbis-key-00.txt
	Pages           : 16
	Date            : 2015-10-18

Abstract:
   The 'Key' header field for HTTP responses allows an origin server to
   describe the secondary cache key ([RFC7234], section 4.1) for a
   resource, by conveying what is effectively a short algorithm that can
   be used upon later requests to determine if a stored response is
   reusable for a given request.

   Key has the advantage of avoiding an additional round trip for
   validation whenever a new request differs slightly, but not
   significantly, from prior requests.

   Key also informs user agents of the request characteristics that
   might result in different content, which can be useful if the user
   agent is not sending request header fields in order to reduce the
   risk of fingerprinting.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-key/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-key-00


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/