Call for Adoption: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis)
Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> Wed, 19 October 2022 23:52 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD100C14F726 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:52:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.631
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.631 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.571, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=apple.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 93B0sH7_EuWi for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09F77C14F6E5 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1olIoL-005SQI-68 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 23:49:21 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 23:49:21 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1olIoL-005SQI-68@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <tpauly@apple.com>) id 1olIoK-005SPL-Fs for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 23:49:20 +0000
Received: from ma1-aaemail-dr-lapp02.apple.com ([17.171.2.68]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <tpauly@apple.com>) id 1olIoI-00Fwr1-SV for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 23:49:20 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (ma1-aaemail-dr-lapp02.apple.com [127.0.0.1]) by ma1-aaemail-dr-lapp02.apple.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 29JNjQfm036527 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:49:06 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apple.com; h=from : content-type : mime-version : subject : message-id : date : to; s=20180706; bh=sYalovEfPwpeGVvqta79Xew6dBnWvB7nDhg+O/H4i48=; b=TQ7mrmz0IwRqipH0bkjyytUOIoKeCW8HsE8h6c6+KtDwuoXMqiMkjoDsEoLDmFku80bq i3KJeA5Co1UiUaGbD4EoATsWuScLvUz5i8bwcUX9g8YoDaCykR04fXLlalcHaFXbm3Kw BiUkOdkjhs/HYQ3C47E1mzg1a2cxVtbYPR3J4ESiustS9TZpKIel+QTPTk0/U9a+/qv/ 6hejuiEYO3qg+mN1JEFQ0pc/YdPMq2UlFPtSYCQp45t7eyvamPeXOlU56EkW4B6peRtJ Wmb/QK4zeGfEBUKQVeFswF+Q964Cp02zrfDUJ8fH7gRP0T3TidJGCEO6A0knCtKDmR+y /g==
Received: from rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp02.rno.apple.com (rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp02.rno.apple.com [10.225.203.150]) by ma1-aaemail-dr-lapp02.apple.com with ESMTP id 3k7sht7vpx-3 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:49:06 -0700
Received: from rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com (rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com [17.179.253.14]) by rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp02.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.19.20220711 64bit (built Jul 11 2022)) with ESMTPS id <0RK000T9OY5S5S30@rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp02.rno.apple.com> for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from process_milters-daemon.rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com by rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.19.20220711 64bit (built Jul 11 2022)) id <0RK000500XJP7A00@rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com> for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Va-A:
X-Va-T-CD: aeebd4fdd5963ddcce0b17227227efb6
X-Va-E-CD: 2c231110b1229b6d0e3db4dbc6513ca0
X-Va-R-CD: 3f3cb2f72717e59994f027630ecd7520
X-Va-CD: 0
X-Va-ID: 504ff5e1-7d3b-415f-bb05-81e48b3cf2e6
X-V-A:
X-V-T-CD: aeebd4fdd5963ddcce0b17227227efb6
X-V-E-CD: 2c231110b1229b6d0e3db4dbc6513ca0
X-V-R-CD: 3f3cb2f72717e59994f027630ecd7520
X-V-CD: 0
X-V-ID: 7c1e8ee5-5fa5-4a53-84ff-bf3e491ef8a1
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.545,18.0.895 definitions=2022-10-19_12:2022-10-19,2022-10-19 signatures=0
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([17.234.33.107]) by rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.19.20220711 64bit (built Jul 11 2022)) with ESMTPSA id <0RK000XP6Y5PJ500@rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com> for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F08B4D0E-617B-42B2-AFF2-B3CF57AAACB6"
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3730.0.21\))
Message-id: <7CA07377-9FCE-4976-B420-72534978A6FC@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:48:51 -0700
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3730.0.21)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.545,18.0.895 definitions=2022-10-19_12:2022-10-19,2022-10-19 signatures=0
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=17.171.2.68; envelope-from=tpauly@apple.com; helo=ma1-aaemail-dr-lapp02.apple.com
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=tpauly@apple.com domain=apple.com), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.256, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1olIoI-00Fwr1-SV bd650d05d4a8c2a50655f7538500f098
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Call for Adoption: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/7CA07377-9FCE-4976-B420-72534978A6FC@apple.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/40471
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Hello all, Based on the previous discussion on the list, it sounds like the group has support for revising Structured Fields (RFC 8941) to include the new Date type, so we don’t need to add it as part of draft-ietf-httpbis-retrofit. We also discussed wanting to have a tight scope and be able to ship the update quickly. This email starts a call for adoption of that work, which will begin with the existing text of RFC 8941 as the -00 version and will have a very narrow scope. My proposed scope is as follows (slightly different from Mark’s original proposal, to adjust for some of the discussion on list): - Add the Date type, currently in draft-ietf-httpbis-retrofit - Make the "Defining New Structured Fields” section align with the style guide (https://httpwg.org/admin/editors/style-guide#structured-fields) to not recommend the use of ABNF in new header definitions - Add clarifications to the use of ABNF in the document (for example, emphasize that they are not normative), subject to WG discussion - Address minor technical issues and editorial fixes We’ll run this call for adoption for 2 weeks, ending on November 2, 2022. Please respond to this email if you support doing this work or not, and if you have comments on the scope. Best, Tommy
- Call for Adoption: Structured Fields Revision (RF… Tommy Pauly
- Re: Call for Adoption: Structured Fields Revision… Mark Nottingham
- Re: Call for Adoption: Structured Fields Revision… David Schinazi
- Re: Call for Adoption: Structured Fields Revision… Mark Nottingham
- Re: Call for Adoption: Structured Fields Revision… Martin Thomson
- Re: Call for Adoption: Structured Fields Revision… Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Call for Adoption: Structured Fields Revision… Julian Reschke
- Re: Call for Adoption: Structured Fields Revision… Tommy Pauly
- Re: Call for Adoption: Structured Fields Revision… Tommy Pauly