Re: h2 implementation list -- PLEASE UPDATE
Max Bruce <max.bruce12@gmail.com> Thu, 02 April 2015 02:03 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C051A86F6 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 19:03:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CmEP9unTDplw for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 19:03:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 587C91A1BEE for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 19:03:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1YdUPP-0002aj-6Y for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 01:59:03 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 01:59:03 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1YdUPP-0002aj-6Y@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <max.bruce12@gmail.com>) id 1YdUPM-0002Zx-7g for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 01:59:00 +0000
Received: from mail-ig0-f170.google.com ([209.85.213.170]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <max.bruce12@gmail.com>) id 1YdUPL-00029F-68 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 01:59:00 +0000
Received: by igbqf9 with SMTP id qf9so62037368igb.1 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 18:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=dn5e1ixBmTd14V+XiuDMnIVQu5SECY1Jg7Wr/jWnnvY=; b=vV3mHnR/8L8l7KLBaq9HjUujiczIzXTLGkwZOsBXg38OjTq9qr8mMiUXYKRn2qfpqC RKZY6KzzW6Wdig5NYEBsT3pT5gUpxKlJj7IlY3rSj/+rFpkb7a34rjh1s2HoJl5VIotI 8WCGP116nNavPmYaZ6hE3RxnZ8I3D6XMfo56g8fXVKTEH0qq9xq48eGdkB2kN1/d7ffN Wo5Fp7gkXJifDlvyRHVAHR/k4G70q04qyaxrCvbEn91J1DaYvPEscP2kI8Pts8mbutOo kv0bmCsd+rM9h6ufHAu1x1y3aN+p+bhdP6jY2cydAHUNPcaWrblW/syN8J6o3OXBxOux 3n3A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.129.9 with SMTP id ns9mr16306582igb.24.1427939913357; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 18:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.58.142 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 18:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D24E0668-56B7-4457-8E7C-DF7623AEF77B@mnot.net>
References: <4AC59768-2519-4B95-86F3-43C19B4329E7@mnot.net> <D24E0668-56B7-4457-8E7C-DF7623AEF77B@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 18:58:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CABb0SYS+kTiCKHQUWfnVWV-DKfY6TVWm81UT1BE7xHAtg42E7g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Max Bruce <max.bruce12@gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b343c9c4bdf110512b42bee"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.213.170; envelope-from=max.bruce12@gmail.com; helo=mail-ig0-f170.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1YdUPL-00029F-68 781dd58effd723115e886a1741217654
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: h2 implementation list -- PLEASE UPDATE
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABb0SYS+kTiCKHQUWfnVWV-DKfY6TVWm81UT1BE7xHAtg42E7g@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/29208
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Is draft 17 the final? I never found an actual finalized RFC. On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > Argh. > > Link: <https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/wiki/Implementations> > > > > On 2 Apr 2015, at 11:35 am, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > > > Everyone, > > > > If you have an HTTP/2 implementation, please take a moment to update <>. > > > > The last column is now the APLN protocol ID(s) that your implementation > advertises support for / accepts. > > > > E.g., if you support the last draft version and the final, you’d include: > > > > “h2 h2-14” > > > > Cheers, > > > > -- > > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > > > > > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > > >
- h2 implementation list -- PLEASE UPDATE Mark Nottingham
- Re: h2 implementation list -- PLEASE UPDATE Mark Nottingham
- Re: h2 implementation list -- PLEASE UPDATE Max Bruce
- Re: h2 implementation list -- PLEASE UPDATE Martin Thomson
- Re: h2 implementation list -- PLEASE UPDATE Mark Nottingham
- Re: h2 implementation list -- PLEASE UPDATE Greg Wilkins
- Re: h2 implementation list -- PLEASE UPDATE Mark Nottingham