Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#16)
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 22 August 2014 23:54 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C221A6F67 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 16:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.67
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.67 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id voMeEpKmg10y for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 16:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 803731A6F27 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 16:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1XKycD-0005oV-AT for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 23:51:29 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 23:51:29 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1XKycD-0005oV-AT@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1XKybi-0005lX-Od for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 23:50:58 +0000
Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com ([209.85.217.181]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1XKybf-00049q-Rs for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 23:50:58 +0000
Received: by mail-lb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id 10so9927835lbg.26 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 16:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=15veXrslCm3IWKU4w+EN9m5r6X1sWKrLAHr9cxxMaP4=; b=0KV2NRrYvKR9/USj5TV8Uoq8fAtJR+9hPgyANWMYBTxaQWvtZ/0Qc+BIvvIi5mITV+ M9Yb0mzsAUTaOjfiHF72j/K234X0vwxWAmYsKTRH0YXe7OLsdxG+661QKHnxfnSiYWcL l8Z2AWT/KTg4yo9zFyEV+/swgQ/zF0qRrN04EsxhWZtE1w15QL9nf9oiptZMFDrzsMVF E+bHaewhKfSR76qY5PRUn9sWgzOhGUOVbyuhd1jd5LRFdYeGps5bQ7mD3PyNE7ndqy38 pk4nQHEM6yeDqefK24Lh0/Dfyd8CXInaPv1kVDdo6LTSbR5Gip/a9ecKGi2ufuTHQTyo uJ7g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.184.161 with SMTP id ev1mr19777lbc.82.1408751429152; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 16:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.166.75 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 16:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKC-DJhHz1mk0vdVtwmwyccv=LqUb+GrYVukkUYJY4mWdHE-mg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnUDKqPttrp0T-fyrenkgEm=YzwbdmoaJ=Jti3ER1SEAMw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKC-DJgBKoq_M3xMu5115j+OTudSNMNGwOakXjKRP=odVMPn_A@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXRw7Rc7MJddW4UqSo2=hQ2E2EysLyzcaVM6_xf7h0R9g@mail.gmail.com> <CAKC-DJiG+pNAitg6z0wuL16NDnBp0tNwQhpvEWXs77x_c3f=2Q@mail.gmail.com> <53F34F02.2090807@gmx.de> <CABkgnnVQqYhDyLBvfaqD7oWGjY7WuvuSqWERwjoH=bQeh8k79g@mail.gmail.com> <CAKC-DJiD6_3SZd-k7FXCcwuA4AK7kXVupqXuy2+XuQKWtqP2xA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnW+QM8brr2FkBnOHAhFi9kjdrVoZ+yThckbURq9V5jmnQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKC-DJhHz1mk0vdVtwmwyccv=LqUb+GrYVukkUYJY4mWdHE-mg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 16:50:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWENAO=4TnwK9Rtxudh+SQTzhrwRZdp=Et4DhPjU7m5_w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Erik Nygren <erik@nygren.org>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.217.181; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-lb0-f181.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.726, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1XKybf-00049q-Rs 9b945746a3b9e1cd4c3cc831f03d5c5a
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#16)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnWENAO=4TnwK9Rtxudh+SQTzhrwRZdp=Et4DhPjU7m5_w@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/26714
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On 22 August 2014 14:53, Erik Nygren <erik@nygren.org> wrote: > but does not define anything similar for the ALTSVC frame. Aligning the > frame and the > header would allow this to apply to both. I think that we would want to move the Origin field up to the header with Max-Age. Logically, you store alternatives for different origins separately, so requiring different frames makes sense there. It also removes any potential for duplication. Also 8 bits of length is not sufficient for an HTTP origin if the name is maximum size. I'd assume that the same applies to authority.
- Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#1… Mark Nottingham
- Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#1… Julian Reschke
- Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#1… Mark Nottingham
- Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#16) Martin Thomson
- Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#1… Erik Nygren
- Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#1… Martin Thomson
- Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#1… Mark Nottingham
- Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#1… Erik Nygren
- Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#1… Julian Reschke
- Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#1… Martin Thomson
- Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#1… Erik Nygren
- Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#1… Martin Thomson
- Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#1… Erik Nygren
- Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#1… Martin Thomson
- Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#1… Erik Nygren
- Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#1… Mark Nottingham
- Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#1… Mark Nottingham