IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Thu, 07 May 2020 00:17 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 178233A0DD8 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 May 2020 17:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.751
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.751 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=PuLWZhMP; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=OxevU74L
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3AwOWOtuKv03 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 May 2020 17:17:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BE353A0DD2 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 6 May 2020 17:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1jWUBd-0008KZ-Nn for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 07 May 2020 00:14:49 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 00:14:49 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1jWUBd-0008KZ-Nn@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1jWUBc-0008Jj-HX for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 07 May 2020 00:14:48 +0000
Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.21]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1jWUBa-0000vf-4Z for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 07 May 2020 00:14:48 +0000
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C3B5A6; Wed, 6 May 2020 20:14:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 06 May 2020 20:14:30 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=D cveB+ZXvZQfG/tXRe/VjT0LI7gNXspWP3/Zc8+3i4U=; b=PuLWZhMPTjrIlzwAR ELidhZbAY8JYk4CwygqQ2gZ9MbSuJQeFdsa1Rui3hl2VXaDhaTkNY0HJjoG450hX w7kKLpM7UwfwvsTYBuosyu8PP7woz2To0VaS1pvCVb+4D9u4vdvYCecLGStxodgz fxIceOdIQjIN6bOz+kAuicrbqo2tJqtD8m6W2/HcJRHhEgL1Ox/IMtpGZEt2Z1f3 zpOP6fOeILWSgAt5ATQtylPrrpH9kRvSOQG4tmhLDseFbEEC6qb7bNQxa7ix1V2x cpAPd4wDOTw0WfwMswlDU43dyeeWxN9GDY1DWccgbKSKbQBKxRT1rdN3PtPncLGr o2QFw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=DcveB+ZXvZQfG/tXRe/VjT0LI7gNXspWP3/Zc8+3i 4U=; b=OxevU74LT56txBzb4noCJi4/MzxYiXQsiR3dMeAtgyQAnIKx3eOZc/HLc DF+lIvcEKOxQZRmcDdoYekAYlvyxd8/7AMmFVnNscTMBtTyyuK6ABs0fC0Tql3Wq Ih8Y2/mFKhVS4Aw5qUYa7vSR9MtG0NVi8PTggMoUdgTxtoNz020ofdpjxK+18LAo WpovDN88mPLNRekB8Ml+yrvMSixuFt0/jLDtjsqIEbbHXE9e7maZ2ufzqKolV5oM g/oeVNWTKVXaS75H7KJT+EB6eVFMWfeYXbd8eqkprWlPvRmfzYsn2CyKowjatkkq hJIf6AuTCqC/VyYU/QiNDWyr+t57g==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:5VKzXkOsrEVf7_bEge_n5G3Ch1Nx5YnW8q3NC_5jqWtx20CdcAAmcQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrjeelgdeftdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthhqmh dthhdtvdenucfhrhhomhepofgrrhhkucfpohhtthhinhhghhgrmhcuoehmnhhothesmhhn ohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeevffffhfduteevvefhueffieegtdeutd ehffeltefffedttdeggeejheeiueetteenucffohhmrghinhepmhhnohhtrdhnvghtnecu kfhppeduudelrddujedrudehkedrvdehudenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurf grrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:5VKzXgOUDMQ7ZqcP8i4x6qzBcIYcFwiS-D9R822e0dcr5WB0z8JETQ> <xmx:5VKzXs9Wravv5erdct0Zo4JUXD0pwZdui2-SLRaksOUmBn-LFBF6Fw> <xmx:5VKzXk7m6JH0WsfVsrGFKHU0sg_hMMdQj7FcexodX-ewGeWU2htJXQ> <xmx:5lKzXrTzMyKobDLQgTrDWIMbavEqmX5j2kbK07oO-ocl2zZrUNP2_w>
Received: from macbook-air.mnot.net (119-17-158-251.77119e.mel.static.aussiebb.net [119.17.158.251]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 63F903280067; Wed, 6 May 2020 20:14:27 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <13256.1588748433@critter.freebsd.dk>
Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 10:14:25 +1000
Cc: gen-art <gen-art@ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, last-call@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <977F061C-A4BB-413B-B26C-51C7A694FA74@mnot.net>
References: <158864148815.25056.4870473086918483854@ietfa.amsl.com> <2E578812-9E59-426E-85A9-B3A5AEA12853@mnot.net> <CAPDSy+4y9ZZ-f=MyV1b_-t5OygyYgdr3W4V4soiLVGOgzXKdMg@mail.gmail.com> <11202.1588710553@critter.freebsd.dk> <78C9039F-F687-41A1-A85D-CC8B3B82211B@mnot.net> <13256.1588748433@critter.freebsd.dk>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.21; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1jWUBa-0000vf-4Z 80b3011e6cac936cd7bd25221bdf30bd
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/977F061C-A4BB-413B-B26C-51C7A694FA74@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37582
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> On 6 May 2020, at 5:00 pm, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
> 
>> Example-ScaledInt: 4503;suffix=M
> 
> Would that work without an explanation ?

Perhaps in full context:

~~~
For example:

  Example-ScaledInt: 4503; suffix=M

Could be used to indicate a scaled value; in this case, 4,503,000,000, if the `M` suffix parameter is specified to denote multiplying the integer by 1,000,000.
~~~

Thoughts?

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email