IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Call for Adoption: Early Hints (103)

Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com> Tue, 07 February 2017 03:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75AE81297EE for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 19:08:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PmgzG2pwL5Gx for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 19:08:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01ECB1293DF for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 19:08:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1caw4o-0001eD-Jh for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 03:04:18 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 03:04:18 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1caw4o-0001eD-Jh@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <kazuhooku@gmail.com>) id 1caw4h-0001dS-KY for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 03:04:11 +0000
Received: from mail-oi0-f45.google.com ([209.85.218.45]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <kazuhooku@gmail.com>) id 1caw4Z-00027I-Vu for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 03:04:06 +0000
Received: by mail-oi0-f45.google.com with SMTP id j15so57854133oih.2 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 19:03:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=45DU071hIljrBZ3WruB/iuMjvOVHZrQ5/XMvDBh43nY=; b=Q0prFN8G9DlBmMxeYz8zzxRnUOzughNc3lE6Etq6PAPmzpAfpwLvallQ+BLPRps6DS r4lgLvnlhn+4DjQwGRed+Oa/iLZg3ssy/+RBQ3W18/sCaPsdhcbrqo9N0xh6e4oHGrf0 68CxDEsSluTqATTEgpaXGABl5uHuufoynr24QNcIVMYkzg4W1T51HuMQMZtexy41sH2f ArIplUdL4I1/0fcYegz6dgzq5qlb9vLy5eSBxsI3IkqI3XeSAFgKvJqRzveICm705FY3 xjrhiZJ9rYq5Y+/G05RAAQUuqLSzxRz2LHbNMYvyxlTmWHMyIhkhKopbvVaWg4A2CBZU dtTg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=45DU071hIljrBZ3WruB/iuMjvOVHZrQ5/XMvDBh43nY=; b=pYAATa6Se/PxV4IPQtIyoda5SXH24rAwIWPsXrMFcNW+gMckfq3phAEqVGqmyqNZ0L usCG/gDWP9AJ50oyqsog0rqnbrOwWLCnqZ9F+oDA3jeH40PrtyycGCO+ZMk6cXLscNOy iELLzRNgFg4h+Vwb6wqJoUa5IdYdvWveIxQyZC5riUVg+x86MpQOqLMdxtCR1gAp9i2F z81TgpL4Usr8i09RORfVO18sX6guNNNBdDzfYO8QjyKT16zLCab+1OUaMmUmmGf9Vpmk Tc2dNaF2/915qK47A+NZFiSvapYTexYmRmel0CCrF7OJSaeith9nfrvnV+nOhMXWbaSz UunQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lJeE0D0jYJ4CsagbE9YgyKAjPZvlK+Cm5ED2NtlmRofIOrG3T6KVizmOOebrv0vZbtf40A9lsZt6VQDQ==
X-Received: by 10.202.83.73 with SMTP id h70mr6809717oib.41.1486436617526; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 19:03:37 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.16.113 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 19:03:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <E96EEE4D-6019-4D2E-813D-74865A0A1378@mnot.net>
References: <CAOdDvNos+qXxi8K3HPtkuzkAuc1ctAmdt=Oz+vJy+oBgB7skQA@mail.gmail.com> <F80E59B7-AF83-4E1C-9BA4-15A122D0D434@mnot.net> <E96EEE4D-6019-4D2E-813D-74865A0A1378@mnot.net>
From: Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 12:03:37 +0900
Message-ID: <CANatvzymSbg2=Q9Vrs-7L0tnWkCHXqW6rGk0STHz_J2sr3OEUA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.218.45; envelope-from=kazuhooku@gmail.com; helo=mail-oi0-f45.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.407, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1caw4Z-00027I-Vu 9ce8bb032a914f9606fec00818c57701
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: Early Hints (103)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CANatvzymSbg2=Q9Vrs-7L0tnWkCHXqW6rGk0STHz_J2sr3OEUA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33453
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

2017-02-07 9:12 GMT+09:00 Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>:
> Let's consider this adopted.
>
> Kazuho, are you happy to continue editing?

Yes. I think I can handle it since it's pretty short.

Thank you for the adoption.

> Cheers,
>
>
>> On 8 Dec 2016, at 3:01 pm, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>>
>> Based on the discussion so far, it seems like there's strong support for adopting this draft.
>>
>> Anyone have additional comments?
>>
>>
>>> On 23 Nov. 2016, at 9:26 am, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Gentlefolk of HTTPbis,
>>>
>>> This is a followup to Kazuho's presentation in Seoul[*] where he discussed https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code/
>>>
>>> The idea seemed to have acceptance (both in the room and on the list) with some concerns expressed about interoperability. Kazuho was kind enough to publish an endpoint so you can test if the client you implement has an unexpected failure in the face of 103.
>>>
>>> However, the draft was published pretty close to meeting time and there wasn't much space for discussion in the room. So before we do a Call For Adoption, I would like to hear some more discussion so the chairs can be confident there is interest - even if that discussion is "I would like to implement that" or "what does that accomplish?". Please do chime in, your silence will be taken for disinterest otherwise :).
>>>
>>> -Patrick
>>>
>>> [*] http://recs.conf.meetecho.com/Playout/watch.jsp?recording=IETF97_HTTPBIS&chapter=chapter_1 goto 1:43 mark
>>
>> --
>> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>>
>>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>



-- 
Kazuho Oku

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email