IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Concluding discussion on #612 (9.2.2)

Nicholas Hurley <hurley@todesschaf.org> Tue, 07 October 2014 16:22 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A1241ACE1C for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 09:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.788
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.788 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0GuX3xx4624V for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 09:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADF0D1A6FFF for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 09:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1XbXUG-0000J3-OF for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 16:19:44 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 16:19:44 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1XbXUG-0000J3-OF@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <hurley@todesschaf.org>) id 1XbXUA-0000I1-V0 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 16:19:38 +0000
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <hurley@todesschaf.org>) id 1XbXU9-0007XQ-UP for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 16:19:38 +0000
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by gateway2.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D807E20AA1 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 12:19:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from web2 ([10.202.2.212]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 07 Oct 2014 12:19:16 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=todesschaf.org; h= message-id:x-sasl-enc:from:to:cc:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:date; s=mesmtp; bh=JHg0sFWPmRQfKiiPi1l+nVjrU4c=; b=vj8T lR0fpS6eye+PQ+YmpeG17GtSOyIgQgw2ctBM0FAb1Lnj8DzdQUzN+vxJZOn6d9Re JAcDfR6/Ho20VGxxmI3i7oEpVxFZhG7NbX8c2QeEVLqdcY63IPllcY+Cdv0yBkgM nggp/3XHCbtESYRqIYEdf7CvZS3NWKJIrn0yRww=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:x-sasl-enc:from:to:cc :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to :references:subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=JHg0sFWPmRQfKiiPi1l+nVjr U4c=; b=TOzWAVRfWNFdOTXS4HGd9Hr17gftsLWdmL55Myuv819g602+K3KHGV8w Q97o7PNEuIBFdQKtMC5GrrI3l8g2iLfSnJYLu2T3yOt9cV6lj4kf4Nl7YcEjQO/I m01Fvmy1HALRL4S5ChRJEv+jAn7pSwpqI7pPjGIXRNlOuO01INQ=
Received: by web2.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id AF27554013C; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 12:19:16 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <1412698756.2166003.176192037.236DA008@webmail.messagingengine.com>
X-Sasl-Enc: PJQ2GRvZ60AZ7NipO4CZBI448kMjEJFlK6ZTBU8Xp5oy 1412698756
From: Nicholas Hurley <hurley@todesschaf.org>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-257eafe9
In-Reply-To: <9FEEF0BB-1F6F-4E16-B385-4AC17F680E46@mnot.net>
References: <9FEEF0BB-1F6F-4E16-B385-4AC17F680E46@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 09:19:16 -0700
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.25; envelope-from=hurley@todesschaf.org; helo=out1-smtp.messagingengine.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.757, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1XbXU9-0007XQ-UP 2678d9cb5c5ebf739cf2bb9072cc1fb4
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Concluding discussion on #612 (9.2.2)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/1412698756.2166003.176192037.236DA008@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/27487
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I'm fine with Martin's PR, and would even be fine combining it somehow
with ekr's proposal up-thread. They make the language clearer. Any
weakening or removal of the language in 9.2.2 gets a big "no" from me.

On Mon, Oct 6, 2014, at 22:57, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> I'd like to get to a call for consensus on
> <https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/612> very soon.
> 
> To help get us there, I've prepared a wiki page that I think summarises
> the issues that have been raised:
>   https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/wiki/TlsRequirements
> 
> Martin has made a proposal in the form of a pull request:
>   https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/pull/615
> ... and it looks like there's general support for incorporating it. Does
> anyone have a reason not to?
> 
> Greg has made a number of proposals, listed in short form at:
>   http://www.w3.org/mid/CAH_y2NH=skUXk0QwCs4uVqWE=iOLhi5K+kvARDUQ7uMeogrw9A@mail.gmail.com
> 
> Martin and Greg, do you need time to develop your proposals any further?
> 
> Greg, you made quite a few proposals -- did I miss any others, or do you
> want to selectively nominate one or more of them for consideration?
> 
> Finally, does anyone else wish to make a proposal?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
> 
> 


-- 
Peace,
  -Nick

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status