Re: Cookie-related status updates.
Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com> Tue, 26 May 2020 16:02 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A6613A078A for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 May 2020 09:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mozilla.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fjkwJUK0JrCq for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 May 2020 09:02:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6824B3A0786 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 26 May 2020 09:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1jdbyd-0008Id-45 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 15:58:51 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 15:58:51 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1jdbyd-0008Id-45@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <dveditz@mozilla.com>) id 1jdbyb-0008Hs-FF for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 15:58:49 +0000
Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::435]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <dveditz@mozilla.com>) id 1jdbyZ-0006NI-Je for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 15:58:49 +0000
Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id j16so8472049wrb.7 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 26 May 2020 08:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mozilla.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=E8VN2U5SmcSG8s/nkVfXTbiX7OYagQbPowIJxY/enYk=; b=UBMsHF3smqIdIPqOX5nq0xwHpI8lCnBP6is+663+PY2hh7c+JHWYXLJImdWBbfxEFu eW8AFOJ7gPUoWOdXBKoAdfBIWopQGw0jbomo+JPnbZQmiNFQqV/q51Li/7RXZOJCX8At OmWdO/jxdNIQyV/4NpNFatZxUUK+Crnv70BRM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=E8VN2U5SmcSG8s/nkVfXTbiX7OYagQbPowIJxY/enYk=; b=Rar+j10RIisQxfcumbMwdWpH5jAvQuHzjCNugbHvBA9jIbi2GYusnhheSNhEyFjuC+ fJQmAKcSKU9VvSWPTuG2OCkLLn6tY8I/OzTZKmpPsWR+7IOWu+ADM5CVGXB2y/65g3Mf KsquBVyMIU3xK/ppqiTFi9hWI35cUDZlLWSqp1Y4x+kgYrhUWE301iruHY+Mls6lOWTb g+xu4IZq/r5124dBi6GebKBcWFAw78MrgLBI6nO5iXOS0QUzrdm8263bwk+LpUN1WFeJ g6xlsSrGHX7/4k6JbEcrE6Bo7EMLCIwxDxil3YvsH67Poy7SqLUpKlwdrpoTBJVgwTA5 ZAgw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530cVRcA+oOk6oDv/c0FIgl9uegsSs6Tc9zmhojVKBQ4kHNJwgnw tB/Pk0KjT1QvUZYhTOy5idqBPewaA2zB/NZrrnMcBg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwrCzX8rEiJJtYjuTpjCVOrC9kN0QvVytuD2OrqSxfUX9tDzIfrWLk1ql8HGWIFpsBZZB5YItXE3SQzgpD4zf8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:10d:: with SMTP id o13mr19407300wrx.328.1590508715760; Tue, 26 May 2020 08:58:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAKXHy=fo1dZ_ZZybScPcmxHJQTF0krqvEDN64HbiEWwn+PZHSA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKXHy=fo1dZ_ZZybScPcmxHJQTF0krqvEDN64HbiEWwn+PZHSA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 08:58:19 -0700
Message-ID: <CADYDTCAbRr+jNgugNu0ceT4FjYvFoaefAPLtWZh62B4qpVTuqA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000003fc7b05a68f2bbb"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::435; envelope-from=dveditz@mozilla.com; helo=mail-wr1-x435.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1jdbyZ-0006NI-Je bfbc37d6c86e2cd83b473d91fbc0e4ad
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Cookie-related status updates.
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CADYDTCAbRr+jNgugNu0ceT4FjYvFoaefAPLtWZh62B4qpVTuqA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37713
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 7:22 AM Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote: > 2a. Chrome intends to continue working towards `SameSite=Lax` by > default. We rolled this out at ~50% in stable, and rolled it back in early > April due to some unexpected breakage at a particularly bad time ( > https://blog.chromium.org/2020/04/temporarily-rolling-back-samesite.html). > Our rollout is now holding at ~50% of non-release channels (canary, dev, > beta), and we intend to try stable again, likely over the summer. > Mozilla is also working towards this and has rolled out to 100% of the Nightly audience. No specific timeline on progressing to Beta or Release (beyond "after COVID"), but we are tracking a number of sites that break in this configuration. -Dan Veditz
- Cookie-related status updates. Mike West
- Re: Cookie-related status updates. Daniel Veditz