Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Sun, 10 January 2016 15:52 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982F41A8795 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 07:52:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xdXbcS9Zl0MP for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 07:52:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 549D71ACDEA for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 07:52:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1aIIEs-00033N-5g for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 15:49:06 +0000
Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 15:49:06 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1aIIEs-00033N-5g@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1aIIEp-00032b-Rd for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 15:49:03 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1aIIEo-0002jY-AX for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 15:49:03 +0000
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([93.217.79.150]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LfHs4-1Zplyv27ya-00omdR; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 16:48:29 +0100
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc@ietf.org
References: <CALaySJK5fYy_JCv0Y7Fs3QpPk95fUxyt272JMc-QUpVKO7_gJA@mail.gmail.com> <56853BCC.7030005@gmx.de>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <56927D52.2000106@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 16:48:34 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56853BCC.7030005@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:QYI7SoHFOO2fsa+F72Ot2T9gL95yT9pFPQNLqXbtKZNagUaO+jX 37I14IbsgdOWRb0lktaxWDd1ipLxyTzfXmXqwaNaBh/AvPeVFAM6tVR7qLO71AIuNoRZ7Vz KqzXLIvsjKkOdnKSEkulsZt8iw+VwQxbeuPoCeKz6CQq4mt6kcckmx0iBIkPVi7SCBH3DRa b/gUobRPwZLqi95bGqCEA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:oa2n1uLpP/w=:6phTksV+UrDyYxygbkPgay h/CWwZd94/coN79yd49edByB0M9VIMjayyv7IWAfS2F8Bc34gDE3sOeTROYkNZtPQJnXIFn2x zTQy/LxEyQ6X9KvEATJxuyF6fRHti27fb7Zpyd7hqCKsL3VuMRZMs1W1bX2ergXwAhoJAb4Lm qUsF365r8kvu3169/y1u6ZJetzdM9lXKCK/hhoBppa5MzBobG6hxeWjHER8MXx8Z/EJIV6vWI NixeLSUSHS/NNLQ5HoQmtRf+4MxmJmmO8WW4sCypBBq5bsN6Pz0/H8Flj/Rl3fQUiRXX1qbG1 bxgiosvMIMVQ70mFUtO/GZuK+iG2l0qhz6SUapzEGz+cxnb7Wt5PWNIyO76rifURVJHssT4hi 5ullbm3fNj9TKsGGv1bePW3Ho+M7E7xqEUcjJv0cuoPoBAbBA0VzuednGe+SjV9A3clpPvSo4 /02o7BvtUKAizPDZsnu5C+ympXyhAPB3m2PmTVwtHLQiNEsCbckUV6ixakQrhPl4VojnxjDpu uURbFXmVanu98912/oyILWJrujm4bu4QCcwapBbWQkFdlpEizkKk2c60XPcGEsh1loo3mtJR6 xBd1xYnEjH1TllaryJcuhI9rqJbS8YbzRqy5ybeLq68iq/lKF7sA1mu0CqjZAakaaJjukc4t7 x8qWuRiMCjnuy4OC0+YzyTA8VBPdYkhS2vX6cialhMFn6fqXM8JZ7rY1c+c4MvHVj27O9RuTd y75cQ8CmslHc2q84DeopqYydV/xUxM87lCAfQF8pHTA8HcuwabQ7WJ7KK6b16tmMmpu5iFbX7 S+YXUC4
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.20; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.426, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1aIIEo-0002jY-AX eb196f97cb575509179db1ea5b2e5dd9
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/56927D52.2000106@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/30874
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2015-12-31 15:29, Julian Reschke wrote:
> ...
> ...
>>     If a client becomes aware of multiple alternative services, it MAY
>>     choose the most suitable according to its own criteria (again,
>>     keeping security properties in mind).
>>
>> I don't think this is a 2119 "MAY": what *else* can it do?  You have no
>> other guidance about which alternative alternative to pick, so....  I
>> think this should just say, "it chooses the most suitable...."
>
> Agreed. I haven't changed that yet as it affects normative language but
> I will unless somebody wants to defend it soonish.
> ...

-> 
<https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/a9df1e33703a2cb46c9b441bfca5bbc04fff80d1>

Best regards, Julian