Re: p1: BWS

Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> Fri, 19 April 2013 12:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B43921F95A0 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 05:12:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7wLNM2KXqcxv for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 05:12:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C95C21F9590 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 05:12:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UTAAc-0006zV-N3 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 12:12:02 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 12:12:02 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UTAAc-0006zV-N3@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1UTAAY-0006xe-Mp for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 12:11:58 +0000
Received: from ip-58-28-153-233.static-xdsl.xnet.co.nz ([58.28.153.233] helo=treenet.co.nz) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1UTAAX-0000oa-EY for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 12:11:58 +0000
Received: from [192.168.2.7] (103-9-43-128.flip.co.nz [103.9.43.128]) by treenet.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667F8E711D; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 00:11:31 +1200 (NZST)
Message-ID: <5171346F.2060802@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 00:11:27 +1200
From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
CC: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <DB8598D0-7AD8-4A90-806B-E4C7B65118D7@mnot.net> <516F76CB.20406@treenet.co.nz> <20130418060211.GC13063@1wt.eu> <468FAE72-012D-43EB-A5A7-EAA137687F87@mnot.net> <CAP+FsNdrf-7h=8+68AirD8jJRvhBXf-1uxmXc_3R80418yW2uA@mail.gmail.com> <D258E088-782D-4E16-976C-235F94520964@mnot.net> <20130419053845.GF19970@1wt.eu> <CAP+FsNdLJZTnfe6zU9y834g0X9DVkx-gipO68K5AWdCrx9srcw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP+FsNdLJZTnfe6zU9y834g0X9DVkx-gipO68K5AWdCrx9srcw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=58.28.153.233; envelope-from=squid3@treenet.co.nz; helo=treenet.co.nz
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.449, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1UTAAX-0000oa-EY 8f9c9e40c8f4676bf609f714644c6625
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: p1: BWS
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/5171346F.2060802@treenet.co.nz>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17364
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 19/04/2013 6:56 p.m., Roberto Peon wrote:
> +1
>
>

+1.

Amos

> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu 
> <mailto:w@1wt.eu>> wrote:
>
>     On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 08:27:21AM +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>     > We can either:
>     >
>     > - make it a MUST
>     > - document what the exceptional circumstances are that cause the
>     SHOULD (but I don't think it's that kind of SHOULD)
>     > - downgrade it to an "ought to"
>     >
>     > I do note that we say "generate" there (which I missed before,
>     sorry); in our
>     > terminology, that means you DON'T need to fix it up when
>     forwarding it; it's
>     > only when you're actually creating the element that this applies.
>
>     Ah OK then I agree with a MUST as well.
>
>     +1 then :-)
>
>     Willy
>
>