Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 21 November 2016 03:20 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655921296AB for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 19:20:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WCJ1bO2fpArm for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 19:20:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A57D3129564 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 19:20:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1c8f6w-0000B6-54 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 03:17:38 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 03:17:38 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1c8f6w-0000B6-54@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1c8f6q-0000A4-Ms for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 03:17:32 +0000
Received: from mail-qk0-f173.google.com ([209.85.220.173]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1c8f6k-00086t-LC for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 03:17:27 +0000
Received: by mail-qk0-f173.google.com with SMTP id n21so334628660qka.3 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 19:17:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EgnvRNyqsUfm35AeNYqs2NMtWsMNOLlPHDV/HnbcUfI=; b=AcNeoLVqbfniSWIWN2RIurhrf50HWuLvRvMlIrSEGUkl0QeqBG6d50hyv91k1wlz+5 VECzckuRGzFiHJHC/g12kpNt4kWiS3HRuczKgT0dAM6yvYGLf4ou7FhYFqQ8Znp4jkkA X+iXLoEEcRgVDjjZUeRhhyHUuWzXfvlrIFAvuV06+/bXbc6N7yy+FFGmBo97wGVsvcJB tzIMLuqrlCn2Wpb5H61sTfP6IBE+UtmoTZghxSp/LAN25bmD4UwAW4fz8eBgUkFkvARQ 6RSPdtBPdLIYyoWlBg657z7ypBg+jN+zsyRBE9qyCmeW8vyAXPRKT/ySSGmaoFUuAS3Y mBwg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EgnvRNyqsUfm35AeNYqs2NMtWsMNOLlPHDV/HnbcUfI=; b=geJrKkwvxDlLrx7NyotsibulIzuN7a4akYiR+EMKEppDvIxXsOVD+GBFXs66VQ4Ivk GT/trLtdYTe1mdhPkjoBsOBCR6qnq9x5QqWe+NjE9OEv4xTq82VnxUx9Q4NDhJ/4SPJD 3XaVSXUvalsF5UDEjxvBq09BSbDxFqX9h7jesJMIY3Y3B3zm+gm3MMzCjMJ3F83/Kea0 Wasf51bN6jGPLKadOhxcYvBpK8uPbyA9kT7usZ8bGDsGoq659QEuKWVBsjtn2Zs8ZAUq oRVEgVk4OwdySZ+2y9rBrbMA0+DVCdyxraBU0o5GxovXOebbF5lbS88EIQJw+nbvR4Y7 HGnQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01Fhly8i5iLT+jiUZp1/+fnFzRF2QDMbLd32JVkulPXnDt3FQaGTgzWtHqThnL1Tzp3IyRVLZV2braXUg==
X-Received: by 10.55.150.131 with SMTP id y125mr13230843qkd.115.1479698220097; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 19:17:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.85.101 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 19:16:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <3A206EA7-57FB-4913-BC08-445BD2EFA783@mnot.net>
References: <3A206EA7-57FB-4913-BC08-445BD2EFA783@mnot.net>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 14:16:59 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnV8=2_sR-B-6e9Haxi+4M4DF4V7f3CWCVvXDHNN_SkTKw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Received-SPF: softfail client-ip=209.85.220.173; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk0-f173.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.103, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1c8f6k-00086t-LC bdbde94f9e03e237cf4067a66bde93aa
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnV8=2_sR-B-6e9Haxi+4M4DF4V7f3CWCVvXDHNN_SkTKw@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32940
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 21 November 2016 at 13:38, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> The feeling in the room was that we should abandon the JFV draft and adopt the structure draft in its place, with the understanding that it better reflected our current thinking in this area.

This seems like a good plan.  PHK's work is closer to what we do today
and therefore less disruptive.

We discussed some of the more ambitious features of the common
structure document, such as integer dates and the angle bracket; is
the intent to pursue these separately?