Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)

Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com> Tue, 25 October 2016 09:15 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2985412944A for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 02:15:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.951
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.951 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PHJqg-CheMjy for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 02:15:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCFE8129499 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 02:15:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1byxlL-0003zT-EQ for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:11:15 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:11:15 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1byxlL-0003zT-EQ@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <tyoshino@google.com>) id 1byxlH-0003xt-08 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:11:11 +0000
Received: from mail-yw0-f178.google.com ([209.85.161.178]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <tyoshino@google.com>) id 1byxl8-00069w-6H for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:11:07 +0000
Received: by mail-yw0-f178.google.com with SMTP id w3so124659ywg.1 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 02:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VV63j2l8j1eUi1GncvHdQ7gMU0wrLAvrAygVq5mRTV8=; b=fcYXmSHsfmJeek6PgcC92uRuXhJUDe6ESeTR3EOqcuu2eost81Wz251g6+nS5qsEBj 8OY+XZfFzKk3q0kHnJPSJFRAc7JifE8APz+nBIRjakM6BSpI1H/QDtXgd+tmBdYtrevb y3choQ0M5vAvrKnSv46NOUrkIzCz2cWKUVF5xwpP+DLxv3bX+O+iqOQymEI1wiGekuGf O8cVH6DOQp28fj6mVJ/c/4SAmRtnNBPjUr0MYDuu08zmenQK28gpcgmesxUmWKkKBmPb F4ignRy26uGM/2GWOIEcZVKYFXieVBJxrrAnLvx/Ljf/ZG18NIeM/YHpsC7SeqOKd8D6 Jr2A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VV63j2l8j1eUi1GncvHdQ7gMU0wrLAvrAygVq5mRTV8=; b=aaax/Sk4mlfWLTJ/SEGTs+19fvrtE7m2Ivv0T+YHqHkfCaIaTXBv8b+nEe5joMQ3w+ OdDOOfiqdl+j2t5ZhE4WJG9LINSf8fWM2LEpy6jHSv06zlxITSOyyVl4dsCo9Vp6fuxl hV2NWmLuS8hkHmkp22Ns169W/7/BYvY8kY7cUyHIZJi7/Yn42htnzO7aLXRbwaZH6Xvj zETIeDKmzzE/Qgzyz3T7U9KSfwZmibYafRxYq0RSBPqu+XfxzlQo0aXsfiHQtu4okZRi pJiGmhu+ZZGZDjCr66phVVheJ8d1Goh95HtD3unsgdTdQOASxMey9kDaTmhBror9vtnF H4vQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvewYnT7f8d+8Iq8+KTjvKSqDSlU6BdGAQalMRzHyfBC+M/ddiYEJpYu8+9T48UuGdnYAEbCkzBEYYig+YWl
X-Received: by 10.107.154.134 with SMTP id c128mr16748743ioe.184.1477386635964; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 02:10:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.113.68 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 02:10:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <43998e7b-9227-7562-b2c6-c08134065e22@ninenines.eu>
References: <CAH9hSJZdBJ02+Z6o=aanZ=5PN=9VwyL1ZcX2jct-6f_FFivLGA@mail.gmail.com> <0f79ddf6-c455-c41a-f269-a1bdcef05b14@ninenines.eu> <CAH9hSJb2R9gv2vNqoyTjbMV4hZTYdpX2PoAoYgWUT1UuigLHRA@mail.gmail.com> <5541be74-afcc-6aef-404e-63acb2f608eb@ninenines.eu> <CAH9hSJarsNFqX1tAL7BZmZQwUrEQs1X3wtrAPuMyz8s-k_7WRg@mail.gmail.com> <43998e7b-9227-7562-b2c6-c08134065e22@ninenines.eu>
From: Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:10:15 +0900
Message-ID: <CAH9hSJbHPFSgD0WtRAgyqLrpq7y=GMhyHnvu6x1i_VRUcbitAA@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?B?TG/Dr2MgSG9ndWlu?= <essen@ninenines.eu>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Wenbo Zhu <wenboz@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1140b9a4a25da3053face153
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.161.178; envelope-from=tyoshino@google.com; helo=mail-yw0-f178.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.444, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.339, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1byxl8-00069w-6H ac95fc8bd03b9031a2419c9f782b364f
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAH9hSJbHPFSgD0WtRAgyqLrpq7y=GMhyHnvu6x1i_VRUcbitAA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32672
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Loïc Hoguin <essen@ninenines.eu> wrote:

> On 10/25/2016 11:54 AM, Takeshi Yoshino wrote:
>
>> <snip>
>> Oh, sorry for being unclear. I meant that we'll use
>> "application/subprotocol+webstream". I.e. introducing +webstream as a
>> new media type suffix.
>>
>
> Ah!
>
> OK I have no problem with that.
>
> <snip>
>>     * By the way, don't know if consistency is desirable, by maybe
>>     calling it application/web-stream is better. Maybe not.
>>
>>
>> Could you please elaborate the proposal?
>>
>
> I mean there's already text/event-stream, so application/webstream is not
> consistent with it (missing the dash). But maybe it doesn't matter.


Oh, I see!


>
>
>     * The HEAD method behaves as usual. The PUT method is probably not
>>     compatible with doing this. PATCH and DELETE are not compatible AFAIK.
>>
>>
>> I'm feeling that we should just limit the scope of the proposal to GET
>> and POST.
>>
>
> Sounds good to me.
>
> Thanks for the great work! I look forward to implementing this.


Thank you so much for the review and suggestions!