IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 09 December 2016 03:37 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A1C129625 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 19:37:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XAlaOG3krYs6 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 19:37:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7015129622 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 19:37:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cFBxe-0001Bl-C5 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 03:35:02 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 03:35:02 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cFBxe-0001Bl-C5@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1cFBxX-00016P-8u for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 03:34:55 +0000
Received: from mail-qk0-f193.google.com ([209.85.220.193]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1cFBxR-0004bi-8Q for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 03:34:50 +0000
Received: by mail-qk0-f193.google.com with SMTP id x190so710723qkb.0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 19:34:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=o3FVabV1VFfU43iVbDK4uOWVkeHyTv9rXr6iFaQmYk4=; b=VAqHbvu5AEty81AJC7cGHPmoUo1IGVJV0QwrQH9OvrtjTM1NPvNo8e1qLQrKdeZcg3 Vp6HYobzfuAN73XqR9F6Zed3FQnb1rxPoiIkYe/jeMYaV7E4FVuNnbUVMKutmabsCJga d7nv5LPDQIX3RYApTF9WYwLOsd4Qb/k25XPSWbkMA10lUVEPv/wt8cq+vAd2riTh+Vh5 V4kpnS9s/EGi2NZb7SeH2T66PjipIzn04ZTYSV3w8eBMxtz6XnJxUsdfEWe7nc4OCicQ j2hXAUNKXXMrnrJ5UPOU1T6YTa4NQzFK+NZQ+R8n0B3pOod7nluuG3vhOL0ZRVULrBG+ x0/A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=o3FVabV1VFfU43iVbDK4uOWVkeHyTv9rXr6iFaQmYk4=; b=IhsolbPp/kjR81wJXuyr83nonZpjlxBjV1IJzjNv0Ds3oDsG6fxkvAFDWxIZHcw5sZ BHN6FEWOrYEZ0sfasNeb0KYkICMYSGDZTfRL9+8itfYrTFGaPCrT2g6ln3IX+GUZA4qR XQHc5FuyusEaPk9mpDBqcQSjtom4q0gXCCnE8wR8mW286llbz2kP9FrDKgtNkJthVo1y 3ldqVttYU/wTDWshZq9ombFhyL6oxwNctbeEA1gkl8LDDXQ/cq70NlWz8+MpPPSxOWUc SCgb+WVkm61gqauIfYY0iUC9BLXECz8o/SNIBHAWWA1LBZ2BA7/vAsA251JIb7BBppxM XUrQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02LZTHbPLs/TacoA6BZcaFUEENTWiZJx46znY1m63AVBc+snAmrFjd+GYpmhPbXZrKuUmZBNeykSgifOQ==
X-Received: by 10.55.126.193 with SMTP id z184mr35502456qkc.115.1481254462865; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 19:34:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.38.233 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 19:34:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <7FA10300-F81A-439A-AA93-5B7595162FF5@mnot.net>
References: <20161130043354.C786DB81319@rfc-editor.org> <1102C272-E8D6-40D3-9D39-7D4801ABD286@lukasa.co.uk> <CABkgnnXYTi0uv=Dm7zPrA=oPam+Zyka-jujFT2bU8GvqvT5JPg@mail.gmail.com> <03C57CE4-E61A-4BF6-A976-2191EB4B127C@lukasa.co.uk> <CANatvzzQZ_isxmd3Ne41QxE2s-sYsrksME+T0RtchM-K1b0DwA@mail.gmail.com> <24141783-A04A-42AD-9730-EB5C91A36516@lukasa.co.uk> <CABkgnnXXLUfC9q5YSQjRWZOqyPevkVrPT2VKvUAEK7caxQDDng@mail.gmail.com> <7FA10300-F81A-439A-AA93-5B7595162FF5@mnot.net>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 17:34:22 -1000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUJ+1eHgyn4HM2mKd9-=FV+uPoFKDWqjo6Lt=EQdEb_6A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>, Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>, Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>, Roberto Peon <fenix@google.com>, Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.220.193; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk0-f193.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.007, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1cFBxR-0004bi-8Q 194a5b595fb62ddfac918e85daf35664
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnUJ+1eHgyn4HM2mKd9-=FV+uPoFKDWqjo6Lt=EQdEb_6A@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33141
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 8 December 2016 at 17:12, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> Conversation seems to have concluded - this one is REJECT, correct?


Please

v2.19.0 | Report a Bug | By Email