Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Fri, 12 July 2013 07:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69AC821F9B98 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:21:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.862
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.862 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.737, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Eb2AQthqxDEu for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE4A21E8098 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:21:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UxXew-0002Tz-Tt for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 07:20:54 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 07:20:54 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UxXew-0002Tz-Tt@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1UxXeo-0002Rt-TI for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 07:20:47 +0000
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net ([216.86.168.183]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1UxXeh-0003ck-Li for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 07:20:43 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.80] (unknown [118.209.44.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16E8850A86; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 03:20:09 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <3835.1373612286@critter.freebsd.dk>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 17:20:06 +1000
Cc: Sam Pullara <spullara@gmail.com>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CD9E163F-1225-4DA8-9982-8BDBD16B1051@mnot.net>
References: <CA+qvzFPUpcm6kUtJx+rTw8Dpp4Gtx4Bmr3XPDhjNsjchUfN9_w@mail.gmail.com> <51DE1E32.9010801@treenet.co.nz> <CAP+FsNdcYhA=V5Z+zbt70b5e7WmcmXgjG5M9L3vfXeXfTwmRnw@mail.gmail.com> <51DE327C.7010901@treenet.co.nz> <CABkgnnXeqD6wh0dcJ1Dz=4PLAJNkDeGcCuzMr9ATd_7xS7nbGQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7RbcUkLf3CTAB4jwicnsiKWLGVY6=hX0k=0256SR_gcVt9A@mail.gmail.com> <092D65A8-8CB7-419D-B6A4-77CAE40A0026@gmail.com> <3835.1373612286@critter.freebsd.dk>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.183; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-08.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.401, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UxXeh-0003ck-Li d710a9a879cf0ff41caaab952867b432
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CD9E163F-1225-4DA8-9982-8BDBD16B1051@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18716
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi PHK,

This has been brought up a number of times. I think what we need is a concrete proposal *with* a detailed plan for a workable transition to the new mechanism -- which seems to be the (or at least one) sticking point whenever this comes up.

Otherwise, it's amounts to "it'd be nice if the world worked this way..."

Cheers,



On 12/07/2013, at 4:58 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:

> In message <092D65A8-8CB7-419D-B6A4-77CAE40A0026@gmail.com>, Sam Pullara writes
> :
> 
>> How sure are we that the entire idea of header compression isn't a bad 
>> idea?
> 
> I'm entirely convinced it is a bad idea.
> 
> The main gain that can be had from it, is compressing cookies and
> that issue should be solved by moving the cookies onto the server,
> indexed by a client provided session-id.
> 
> -- 
> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/