IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Call for Adoption: draft-richanna-http-message-signatures

Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Thu, 09 January 2020 11:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5C512006F for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 03:30:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uJP1xRgnYf3E for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 03:30:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 885C8120041 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 03:30:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1ipVyO-00026Q-PI for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 11:27:32 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2020 11:27:32 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1ipVyO-00026Q-PI@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4c]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>) id 1ipVyN-00025f-9l for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 11:27:31 +0000
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2a]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>) id 1ipVyM-0000dp-5L for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 11:27:31 +0000
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2a.google.com with SMTP id k188so461619vsc.8 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 03:27:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GlX58i7/XqYtb4HJC34xTM7SCbuBE37CTrY/ATG+qMo=; b=HHfowSV+BcBTKZliGPgzOe08sJsJr79jUp/CKTgipTlAQItc3InHbqU0voooddZEHS Yb2jtK6+Y9BtD2vjL2IT24g/43SHXPmG1Lcs5t/TzN+i3ZY4r6eJTIYEWUiqOW4QkAaS PIu9HMoQ+4SJ2syzI86OGe+9VLDxez81yV0hmKyiYnKUtk1NVG2535MLtkkaUUtmtADA M0jAgSOFeogKhVHVA0FhsxhvdjtUWjnEwjZqPGYt7YmSISjv46SLiyYOLNU27NVj8x5V DKo76MenIJiL7aY5LSuY+KlJKEDNVSB7ct/CN+I8Lg9GLIKXfZX5wf6mtszFUmhFlcHi Q8xg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GlX58i7/XqYtb4HJC34xTM7SCbuBE37CTrY/ATG+qMo=; b=cM2uKX2oYd63NJ+sY2v/D20Iu+TSfP0KqFF+SwpZHsvfitSsnM60uaeQLwS7F/k+zp ZzRbeNqvsgtQv/fekEFKVxuBlV7VXFgsfFTBmuzpT9N0R9A5Gk8YbV4VQ+g25Jr9B+yR RgYTNuslClfviGdXhp0Zvht1CEQb3N4l/7faW0I+opPdODAn46eF35iuUL7x8FUU9ymw obZMtb+qX914ym1sFZohy6cIeclUhhogFXcw+pTTllgdbDdJkKlvWL+3g9aTa6ZHKxBd xnPpJ4Ym2DEPRkkg2ZTB2WV8AAkZRLSk8KkyFf6wschCih7B3fUFD34KXGy9eAcFZqsb RMuA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXMuK5JRtHLhfDh1/DGucemYWWhNfAHNStXTcygGHln/VgZdAHW 7Z2KAAr/qUogZIy91UQup0wrwihhpcu10Ogv4WLi6CaZ
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxhBoEA38joyLXXJxGWK50Ds9VGiVntAI/SfC4TiLlpbFvUw7t2D1X4fYRDx3P8/XxNKZtEY+YR0vpeVwZDOBI=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:d4:: with SMTP id u20mr5866531vsp.27.1578569249279; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 03:27:29 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <76565D7E-C7F5-4D5D-BE3A-6E686E096B14@mnot.net> <1bf9b1fb-10d0-4948-a7e6-a913e54b7828@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1bf9b1fb-10d0-4948-a7e6-a913e54b7828@www.fastmail.com>
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2020 11:27:18 +0000
Message-ID: <CALGR9obRChNiPZN7O-pk3BxeeTKkgPoeXhCtU0UhLP3xbHFA7Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005b52f7059bb34b3f"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2a; envelope-from=lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com; helo=mail-vs1-xe2a.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1ipVyM-0000dp-5L 97dc5f715fee57d18296a9a865ba8440
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: draft-richanna-http-message-signatures
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CALGR9obRChNiPZN7O-pk3BxeeTKkgPoeXhCtU0UhLP3xbHFA7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37241
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi Mark,

A video of the presentation at SECDISPATCH is also available on YouTube.
IETF106-SECDISPATCH-20191119-1710 at the 50 minute mark, direct link:
https://youtu.be/CYBhLQ0-fwE?t=3006

I think it makes sense to discuss in the HTTP WG, I would be willing to
review and contribute. I think its important to figure out how this
approach differs from other signing methods mentioned previously, and to
document/articulate that in a way that is accessible to the wider community.

There is a relationship between Digest header and signatures, having some
way to discuss this coherently may be beneficial.

From the presentation, slide 11 titled "Cavage Signature Drama":

> * Editors of draft publish major updates in draft -11
> * Everyone using it freaks out and pegs to draft -10

draft-richanna-http-message-signatures clearly states that it is based on
draft-cavage-http-signatures-12. Do we have a sense of the appetite for
implementers to pick up any evolution of this specification basis, or is
draft-cavage-http-signatures-10 too sticky?

Cheers
Lucas

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email