Re: h2 proxy and connection flow control
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 21 August 2014 18:22 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49CD91A058E for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.67
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.67 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A9MeLb50vMP2 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:22:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7F701A049E for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:22:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1XKWwr-0008DL-93 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:18:57 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:18:57 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1XKWwr-0008DL-93@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1XKWwO-0008BQ-L7 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:18:28 +0000
Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com ([209.85.212.169]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1XKWwN-0001ds-S0 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:18:28 +0000
Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id n3so3757wiv.4 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=hZBpgHWe3gcFsMRtyBjUmR5CZVW2aD4wqsT89mdfI0w=; b=Y5pVS6pkC28EqCtpOPy2nkJ8mFlmIR70uyvqdZ4x/7wRf1GBcUKbRNjx2oU3XsjLBc kx9JhsFxisyLqyHHqFk7xd2+BkHCgJR7LrZO/OzYFsU32KZjNYzW99uLMj7zpgIwOWqV eCvwWN97ItdxOjYMlQS6jGzj/kGlbMwYrv+SkFnM6MjkpuSquLYxpn/6Z5BLRv3vYRYh 9jYNtRcF+bWW8BpL/9pxteHiQN/VsoxRo5vOTlRr4GlMxGVmzH8SUlEmXfDBz1dT6CMm WIpf2ZLAunpVNfhaXmx6E1f6TC4x4ag6zRirpTkyJVvUW6dh2bleuex27FFuEwKoSzKv JC1w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.205.70 with SMTP id le6mr190545wjc.25.1408645081433; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.6.229 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAPyZ6=+0Ot1XRNw38rBX1hH04hJ1i6pVDpL+CsLUifozB1tDQw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPyZ6=+9sEFaaEBHSvhbzck6mLthatDVamMckYfnUXVMhVbiVg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOdDvNqX0H7hhxtx3ODniuYQU5wt9Qi91BDjOcENssi_m4PbQA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPyZ6=J1b6VYaBJ==H7FsO9ofe9BTv53+DoDTCeRtW8TPmx=Bw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOdDvNr3g5Ch80ypTThNvZDPftPG5Qive6WmHrvHgsw4NEXOTA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPyZ6=+0Ot1XRNw38rBX1hH04hJ1i6pVDpL+CsLUifozB1tDQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:18:01 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWyUQ1jeMTooLbOTV2dB-9EtMGZ9n3+vjg3DF+9-rA5pA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com>
Cc: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, HTTP <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.212.169; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-wi0-f169.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.733, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1XKWwN-0001ds-S0 7d055917a1b627714d24a65496f0f06e
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: h2 proxy and connection flow control
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnWyUQ1jeMTooLbOTV2dB-9EtMGZ9n3+vjg3DF+9-rA5pA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/26696
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On 21 August 2014 07:56, Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com> wrote: > So if there is no ram to spend for that connection, is stalling entire > connection inevitable consequence (and we should not care about it)? > Connection flow control is limit the memory commitment for proxy then why do > we need to extend it in the response to a client behavior? If the proxy wants to enable a measure of concurrency, setting a stream flow control window that is lower than the session flow control window makes sense. A value that is lower by some multiple will enable concurrency of ceil(multiple). Obviously, low values are going to produce suboptimal performance, so there is a trade-off.
- h2 proxy and connection flow control Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
- Re: h2 proxy and connection flow control Patrick McManus
- Re: h2 proxy and connection flow control Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
- Re: h2 proxy and connection flow control Patrick McManus
- Re: h2 proxy and connection flow control Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
- Re: h2 proxy and connection flow control Amos Jeffries
- Re: h2 proxy and connection flow control Martin Thomson
- Re: h2 proxy and connection flow control Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
- Re: h2 proxy and connection flow control Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: h2 proxy and connection flow control Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
- Re: h2 proxy and connection flow control Martin Thomson