IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-04.txt

Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> Tue, 21 January 2020 07:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF634120096 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 23:48:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.651
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.651 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lr1YmiXK8AqN for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 23:48:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C6F1120071 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 23:48:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1itoEu-0000ws-Be for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 07:46:20 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 07:46:20 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1itoEu-0000ws-Be@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4f]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <daniel@haxx.se>) id 1itoEt-0000w6-6d for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 07:46:19 +0000
Received: from www.haxx.se ([2a00:1a28:1200:9::2] helo=giant.haxx.se) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <daniel@haxx.se>) id 1itoEn-000464-J6 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 07:46:19 +0000
Received: from giant.haxx.se (mail [127.0.0.1]) by giant.haxx.se (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-4) with ESMTPS id 00L7k8be025042 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 08:46:08 +0100
Received: from localhost (dast@localhost) by giant.haxx.se (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id 00L7k7RW025028 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 08:46:07 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: giant.haxx.se: dast owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 08:46:07 +0100
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
X-X-Sender: dast@giant.haxx.se
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In-Reply-To: <157959159604.20086.5727376832771406190@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2001210842530.8039@tvnag.unkk.fr>
References: <157959159604.20086.5727376832771406190@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
X-fromdanielhimself: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Received-SPF: none client-ip=2a00:1a28:1200:9::2; envelope-from=daniel@haxx.se; helo=giant.haxx.se
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1itoEn-000464-J6 df8c336812b7385c75753d5dedf12bf8
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-04.txt
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/alpine.DEB.2.20.2001210842530.8039@tvnag.unkk.fr>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37257
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Mon, 20 Jan 2020, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:

Section 2.3 says:

>  The term "public suffix" is defined in a note in Section 5.3 of
>  [RFC6265] as "a domain that is controlled by a public registry", and
>  are also known as "effective top-level domains" (eTLDs).  For
>  example, "site.example"'s public suffix is "com".

This confuses me greatly. Is this a typo? Surely "site.example"'s public 
suffice is "example" ? How is that related to "com" ?

The following paragraph seems to have got it right.

-- 

  / daniel.haxx.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email