IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Design Issue: Frame Size Items

James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Wed, 08 May 2013 06:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11ED321F8F3C for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2013 23:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.561
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.561 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sSuUUClApjh7 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2013 23:47:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6326021F8F29 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 7 May 2013 23:47:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UZy9a-0000wS-CV for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 08 May 2013 06:47:06 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 06:47:06 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UZy9a-0000wS-CV@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jasnell@gmail.com>) id 1UZy9P-0000bO-SH for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 08 May 2013 06:46:55 +0000
Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com ([209.85.214.182]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jasnell@gmail.com>) id 1UZy9P-0004OU-9k for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 08 May 2013 06:46:55 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id eh20so1412430obb.13 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 07 May 2013 23:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=dmUXn9kQf5Qesa1Ehm9CS+yKfTwPzMxnPrNm1Gpw9lA=; b=kFRtDGYxdM7TlJoe+eaufx4dXX6g+lmi/QEwaIEmWfuG/sowad5XsM9RoV8459z/fW 59Rc91W76n0xR70bblwt/k3DCxA1wjtheL8XXsDFiPCNyD9OKu2SfWva0ChkNCt3BLgi o1iRNR8YI+hJhEamzvGFiBNQjYyQHzcrBvDND+8uCxT4V7lSJszYK2OgkD68Zl9ybBUO uB05PqhQVeLqSHBpbBBq9dp6Dqg3h/mqv+KKV+/KwphG/4cwzUcB1sIhqgqv5FUqZfzA snS3Lqy0sBb4kxr33XAbmFhV4eZ+nRdoQDXENIaKuWuU+rAQDgkY+VMPB0vyd8FKE/q8 8RcA==
X-Received: by 10.60.92.41 with SMTP id cj9mr1605356oeb.31.1367995589403; Tue, 07 May 2013 23:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.3.137 with HTTP; Tue, 7 May 2013 23:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7499.1367994876@critter.freebsd.dk>
References: <CABP7RbcUDvmYjUjE703UTgOcYTSLBohR7EFw2Rb9u-EDkB7htg@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYgwggq4FNweDCEfbsp-fN3yJ8p35jx=fK8Xc5adk+fUVg@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnVvhxw_h1QEM3U=pRwKFdZ5GudEiz+UwNf99M5vjMvVLQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYgKnYhgvArS7FSWqRSf4MfhRbymCiGOC3E21E6R32KWCQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7Rbe+N+JEesvsV4EeQnc-7YSyiUmp2_46cD7znAA9OcNTZQ@mail.gmail.com> <7499.1367994876@critter.freebsd.dk>
From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 23:46:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CABP7RbcTGoLNxzQkdfjjSm4qR2D22oKCm8yrFRkU8Piv6AM=kQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: "William Chan (陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.214.182; envelope-from=jasnell@gmail.com; helo=mail-ob0-f182.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.701, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UZy9P-0004OU-9k 510d931ad8ded2d317f73efc338e4440
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Design Issue: Frame Size Items
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABP7RbcTGoLNxzQkdfjjSm4qR2D22oKCm8yrFRkU8Piv6AM=kQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17890
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

In this case it's not arbitrary at all, that's what's currently
written in the spec. At this point I'm just putting a stake in the
ground, there's plenty of time to fine tune it.

On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
> In message <CABP7Rbe+N+JEesvsV4EeQnc-7YSyiUmp2_46cD7znAA9OcNTZQ@mail.gmail.com>
> , James M Snell writes:
>
>>Proposal: Let's define that 8192+8 is the default MAX_FRAME size.
>
> 8192 is a pretty arbitrary choice, wouldn't it make sense to do a
> bit of math on typical MTU's and TCP/IP header sizes and see if
> any numbers work out more optimal ?
>
> --
> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email