Re: Header addition with HTTP 2.0
Bence Béky <bnc@chromium.org> Tue, 31 March 2015 20:21 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 400FD1A86EB for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:21:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vd_fVm6kiVOx for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:21:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 843CD1A86FF for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Yd2cM-000649-94 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 20:18:34 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 20:18:34 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Yd2cM-000649-94@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <bnc@google.com>) id 1Yd2cF-00061R-AS for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 20:18:27 +0000
Received: from mail-qc0-f169.google.com ([209.85.216.169]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bnc@google.com>) id 1Yd2cE-0001bP-8l for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 20:18:27 +0000
Received: by qcay5 with SMTP id y5so24037393qca.1 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=8OOv7x81neZfMmB/QCe6BYqGvd/UGO0HJQHxZbHfmEA=; b=cwspvN9rBE9+d7tQjNfdNE09C7Idq0a44zM/VkVmqU2HowtR3kCwJYY5U97vZqd6qU MxX+9Iq0Vwv2J3yDiOYYva95o7E/D3L1PwKy/BFClEFeWPOVsbWyWSTCZZZMXLDWwQQw nmxidH/7K7QaOXs5eeoU3a3kDxsIgpDkDWxhKq8vUcTFaMWR9+yiEJh1sj/RzbG3VcGH Q3lphZmJcYucUmCDaDVL6xsAk37zJclSRMByXCU3fWW6shly7xNfG3hDe4dRc1y13/QG g2U+z6oP0IfDP+SrlObOem1splvR8qgH1XumddneYUyqk+pUGKDFzNuf78P/tnDPgCm7 ukXA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=8OOv7x81neZfMmB/QCe6BYqGvd/UGO0HJQHxZbHfmEA=; b=KNQcBGqnUWXBl6fTuCNYHDHP99TXQKwqRNfxV7BO1cxyIFcTwIlcMEnJj32wkbFG8b +FBTU+Go5QIQ7H3xCFvoab3Utvg28ZnzrDXARpLl74a130s5rgciRxEbN3mVf5nGdJE6 kjpo9SNKRM/2HZdQ0tj8wHHl7TpDMg40bu3P4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=8OOv7x81neZfMmB/QCe6BYqGvd/UGO0HJQHxZbHfmEA=; b=OrzzdBfqvDsOMNwsNT6Z26lRP0YdQsXql8yiDEB8HXUbpkUp/OHkACaULPehOQ+fp5 MCf9rw5SHmAVTpEqGaDzPOzdmVNI4GQOqLB4PCeCtfa3PGO5S7d7Vs/ODbLNq6Uf33Oc rRqn22KE53JJCIImhNjO3SWXvNrSRtapoAtEopGb+nSnhRx9JPiLRICGLbh2bfUq/I43 7JTYg2CYnliQ8/TuMcN4Qd8d9WBSj3SIqnuxJKcgl2Xd0CZb1KBB6ZK2zrh/e8rq41hf Pik4D9V7OHSViNoZou5OCdmrNRVuYbSZmWL6sCd9UXjsuqClV9AVVgfl7i8qmLmEHWKG bwFA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkPakk1t5rX3xEz+qiY//Hg0KwRHzNlGfMZ7PDGxGu6WxgCMMM116lggU/NCkjEX+oEU+nZ
X-Received: by 10.55.52.13 with SMTP id b13mr14270941qka.7.1427833080242; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: bnc@google.com
Received: by 10.229.178.6 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:17:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKwtvnDh+mmJjf0V6UzZimX7ng0Um8StTdQd=Ej=-rHeWGjLOQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKwtvnAtuF-X3pgbgLe7VAdnMd4+Yy1EeZLaHgyXXTnZRBgFZw@mail.gmail.com> <CACMu3toR56=u+XG1qtGD=HP9Sy32rd_23QNRMzX3+XwucFYxhA@mail.gmail.com> <CACMu3toheWOPAmEFyuM-uH1NZkL-g2Tw-CuFbv_5fAOG8tyY-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAKwtvnDh+mmJjf0V6UzZimX7ng0Um8StTdQd=Ej=-rHeWGjLOQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bence Béky <bnc@chromium.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:17:39 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: gigJlzBvM3Aexz3kl3bqRuwFCqU
Message-ID: <CACMu3tqpQFzCJHRW8DjwhveLY5+-0YAb+owgTBbfevONu7nvXA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Vimala Tadepalli <vimla.c@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.216.169; envelope-from=bnc@google.com; helo=mail-qc0-f169.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.388, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1Yd2cE-0001bP-8l bfba589ea6e9cd9842cbdf43088a2ba4
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Header addition with HTTP 2.0
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CACMu3tqpQFzCJHRW8DjwhveLY5+-0YAb+owgTBbfevONu7nvXA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/29136
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Vimala Tadepalli <vimla.c@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes. I am aware of that. With HTTP 2.0 even URL is inside the headers frame. > Basically it would be similar to adding a new header. Sorry, I forgot about that. In that case, you are right, there is no way to avoid re-encoding the header.
- Re: Header addition with HTTP 2.0 Roberto Peon
- Header addition with HTTP 2.0 Vimala Tadepalli
- Re: Header addition with HTTP 2.0 Vimala Tadepalli
- Re: Header addition with HTTP 2.0 Roberto Peon
- Re: Header addition with HTTP 2.0 Vimala Tadepalli
- Re: Header addition with HTTP 2.0 Vimala Tadepalli
- Fwd: Header addition with HTTP 2.0 Bence Béky
- Re: Header addition with HTTP 2.0 Bence Béky
- Re: Header addition with HTTP 2.0 Vimala Tadepalli
- Re: Header addition with HTTP 2.0 Bence Béky
- Re: [Moderator Action] Header addition with HTTP … Bence Béky
- Re: Header addition with HTTP 2.0 Martin Thomson
- Re: Header addition with HTTP 2.0 Amos Jeffries