Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 03 March 2015 06:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ietf.org@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653E91A034C for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 22:42:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ycg7ivU9i3Mt for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 22:42:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B0371A035F for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 22:42:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1YSgTV-00026m-Ds for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 06:38:37 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 06:38:37 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1YSgTV-00026m-Ds@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1YSgTM-00025q-PE for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 06:38:28 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1YSgTL-00045F-FR for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 06:38:28 +0000
Received: from [192.168.2.177] ([93.217.112.38]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M4o41-1XYMvJ2YI9-00z2kY; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 07:37:56 +0100
Message-ID: <54F556C2.3080003@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 07:37:54 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <2ACFD2A2-D620-4409-BB2E-D7F8C88CB26C@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <2ACFD2A2-D620-4409-BB2E-D7F8C88CB26C@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:0JSFwD0682rw46EQZ3He154RDr6Dc7TBjkSIVWztL2gIjlTvNEq hySAQSNBCm1ZaF+TA+CvjbfLVGlUaFhJK32bX32AqwwIalO1Di3OQXo53NuJlQKg4GSwSb0 fekgM5lNM4OETb7nHF5JOtdx/y/f2FjfTa5U3raPB4k5mmWX6TMeqUQImElgv83TnWA86/p zpWUkrX74xePckk4trjzQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.22; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.421, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1YSgTL-00045F-FR a4551aca3dded3ebea52efc9ff9337e2
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/54F556C2.3080003@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/28877
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2015-03-03 03:49, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Julian has disposed of all of the issues raised during WGLC, and there's only one editorial issue left (regarding RFC2119 language).

The ones I added in github. Amos, are you ok with the changes I made?

> Julian, could you please generate a new WG draft (once you've figured out that last issue) so that we can take a look at it (and the diffs)?

Current drafts are here: 
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info-latest-from-previous.diff.html>.

But yes, I can post a new draft any time.

Best regards, Julian