Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) id D818CC15152C; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 10:11:29 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E77C151079 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 10:11:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.357 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.357 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=w3.org header.b="asX4Yfgw"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=w3.org header.b="KTmiP4LB"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.b="gvwYx0iU" Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6sJeiMuC3dso for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 10:11:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mab.w3.org (mab.w3.org [IPv6:2600:1f18:7d7a:2700:d091:4b25:8566:8113]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E52D2C14CF18 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 10:11:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=w3.org; s=s1; h=Subject:Content-Type:Cc:To:Message-ID:Date:From:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Reply-To; bh=pTY8Lvbj9ji3YfM+7FzF7mQwZ0ehh4qu7XB1ERDsRDQ=; b=asX4Yfgw3Ns0q2Qw35TV2lQHPx LvQlOoEAFNCYcPeOE+dhCGIwaQk7ltPojPLgwkbMpA5+1NDuTAL9wopJlDcy2I9a5GvWi3X4vCbpz VQyhz/9wvzBspx9RGB81oUU6FTBC2i6JIhe6+bG08VAZtL9dUsTKwpVrQy9zwx25KCGSZgpr/oQAy b9JeUN54X12whF3O/K+NSO7RAXLBNvShOlgEUF91SBRMJE8Xk9pHpUHgnkGeITDayBrUvNytGa6UZ vt99QDBec75Aln6csC6/l9QIW796hj0s126wzEhcnCVcRxtRUR7EJqZx4nqFeDaaCcf4f9o5WYI7f LOAAbmaQ==; Received: from lists by mab.w3.org with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1sWJ21-002Fw6-2T for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 17:10:33 +0000 Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 17:10:33 +0000 Resent-Message-Id: Received: from ip-10-0-0-144.ec2.internal ([10.0.0.144] helo=pan.w3.org) by mab.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1sWJ1z-002FvJ-2T for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.internal; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 17:10:31 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=w3.org; s=s1; h=Content-Type:Cc:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Reply-To; bh=pTY8Lvbj9ji3YfM+7FzF7mQwZ0ehh4qu7XB1ERDsRDQ=; t=1721754631; x=1722618631; b=KTmiP4LBbkYv1hyin3x/BBMMMyF11ZnduaggsJTHf1l5pd15xfmm1qa+i1nr2cr8myKFZVEMZ8R b6N1x/IdbbXqyn2G4xskzkfy9iUk5/RKy7a7RpovS+o631sJW0NYxigt5ED3SZ5L0I1RlmduxEPj+ ZH5NzdNR9DNVpTY1zURvuusjnW9SK1v/qzjsk4flXKcx8Sa9oYTe0jGVGFFnovJAqUjXWBjywYalW Zs7tdZIxz473AlkjN9Bk1t4f+Rrn/HNvgAZ+AjZb4BHXFPcf6AWqEs3fRo+g8c+hbWlJ/AcCEAPjL NdXNnDXM1ETOuhjfUOH6GreepG3Wm9csS4oQ==; Received-SPF: pass (pan.w3.org: domain of google.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::52a as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::52a; envelope-from=nidhijaju@google.com; helo=mail-ed1-x52a.google.com; Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]) by pan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1sWJ1x-00C2ro-31 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 17:10:31 +0000 Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5a28b61b880so1137a12.1 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 10:10:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1721754626; x=1722359426; darn=w3.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=pTY8Lvbj9ji3YfM+7FzF7mQwZ0ehh4qu7XB1ERDsRDQ=; b=gvwYx0iUut1qy5a7YDVFnFJBq2OuMH8cw+enVpKHe8JsRbuYCmwoGGg/Pk3Q3qQIiY /vT8pvJdLAOYzpAa/dwTTMKssf6jHuxNLNdEaWy7kINS0IxRGegLWgObPANShc77Dd3B dxLJlqI434J6Kg5SdCTdowkx30FwJINCQsQJinHThlBcf9kL4GB7ksd1G+LHggxInMo4 d6MZOrcAnuDwYe6SGv4wwM9rbYJnBNTR4OjMFgjAwBuHIZkh9IB4gEKRq67cSndlOLHW IyXTLU5uO7aUvRvSt9dIIVgRnwg16IEOk/BNxNnUx3iGakrJAP2hthq/zYCv3beOCI/R KnmA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1721754626; x=1722359426; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=pTY8Lvbj9ji3YfM+7FzF7mQwZ0ehh4qu7XB1ERDsRDQ=; b=JctuPcU4h6UnXQ3H/ABOhc5fsBNz26LePxztrdJMZ+hI+VjW3nh1L0UYZHXQ83ThQR ig4V24Ekq50SR5rCXWOsQQvRw0dqOgpq6cPzlWOphRb8mz+szi/3gLwWsJHhOWnfiZty fAn6Vi7h9IrFoawVA/rgORN/WDzigv1pl+g1FLGDxKaksW/3LDsMl7vFCCgu3ewbXduc oAp3XPOG9fLIo1Jjr/9yjfUjShk2YzQhsinzsn0b1wiuav1WZxSv8oZqB1XrgM/BhyNT s+dH4tCHyvqbqFG13LPndbLIcDMUvRG8GM8rAglV8i2QvST6oyUhQC7h2ewxsyMOtEPD ffvg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWuHfUfAR8waeKGtYWdqTEK8yTe+ZmPv/T/34P9iWQUjhe4n7W7boaid52Tu7C0n6mTbiMsll5Enj6Y+53WlvUj2JHT X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw+XI3hDBa540SeO1ujCjL1PhiuSHyjPYlKOJMQ5iCjKeoYMgZI CzddgvflfRBNJ1drWHojtmq+Qg6hgLElx0tD5qKAnDh70V1DuLIKulj10Q3GIXIUIWNktTBa0ub BpZbQVZUhRB7/ovuDA4qqt/qT8+3VpG6IyeM6 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEDAviVHPaILfORhuXRMqqwi2M0/5H2gic0A+yA4rBwBMhsck06PbxKiUI2wSb7Sycvxue28dRAHdBWpwveHJ0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:5211:b0:57c:c3a7:dab6 with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5aacbacdc15mr11806a12.3.1721754625271; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 10:10:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Nidhi Jaju Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 02:10:13 +0900 Message-ID: To: Francesca Palombini Cc: "draft-ietf-httpbis-zstd-window-size@ietf.org" , HTTP Working Group Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d4b434061ded3c72" X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=nidhijaju@google.com domain=google.com), signature is good X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-21.6 X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, DMARC_PASS=-0.001, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1 X-W3C-Scan-Sig: pan.w3.org 1sWJ1x-00C2ro-31 8fcf32cf912eccaf80a3ca814d6fda60 X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org Subject: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-zstd-window-size-01 Archived-At: Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/52105 X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org Precedence: list List-Id: List-Help: List-Post: List-Unsubscribe: --000000000000d4b434061ded3c72 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Francesca, Sounds good! Just landed PR #2839 to add the reference. Thanks, Nidhi On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 9:52=E2=80=AFPM Francesca Palombini < francesca.palombini@ericsson.com> wrote: > Hi Nidhi, thanks for the quick reply. > > > > Re adding the reference to RFC 8878 as well in the IANA registry, I still > think it should be done: the Zstandard protocol mentioned in the > description of the IANA registration is still only defined in 8878 (I wou= ld > have another opinion if this document replaced 8878, but that=E2=80=99s n= ot the > case here). > > > > Ok for the media type, sounds fine as is. > > > > I will request the last call now. > > > > Francesca > > > > *From: *Nidhi Jaju > *Date: *Tuesday, 23 July 2024 at 10:08 > *To: *Francesca Palombini > *Cc: *draft-ietf-httpbis-zstd-window-size@ietf.org < > draft-ietf-httpbis-zstd-window-size@ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group < > ietf-http-wg@w3.org> > *Subject: *Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-zstd-window-size-01 > > Thank you for the quick review! > > I filed an issue with your feedback at > https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/2838 and replied > with the following: > > I see that this document updates the IANA =E2=80=9CHTTP Content Coding Re= gistry=E2=80=9D > registration to reference this doc instead of 8878. I think it should > actually reference both. > > > > Although I'm open to adding a reference to RFC 8878 as well, I'm just > wondering if referencing both docs would confuse people since we want to > make sure that they see the size restriction before using the token. > > Additionally, has the wg considered updating the media type registration > made in > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8878#name-the-application-zstd-media- > for consistency? I am ok with not updating it, as the link is also done v= ia > the document, but just checking for consistency. > > > > This doc is specifically for HTTP Content Coding use cases so IIUC we > don't really want to restrict the media type itself. Applications are fre= e > to transfer zstd archives that used any window size around as files, but = we > just don't want to require HTTP clients/servers to (de)compress with wind= ow > sizes above 8 MB. > > Thanks, > Nidhi > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 7:30=E2=80=AFAM Francesca Palombini < > francesca.palombini@ericsson.com> wrote: > > # AD Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-zstd-window-size-01 > > > > cc @fpalombini > > > > Thank you for this document, short and to the point. I only have one > comment/question, before initiating the IETF last call. > > > > Francesca > > > > ## Comments > > > > ### Reference in IANA registries > > > > I see that this document updates the IANA =E2=80=9CHTTP Content Coding Re= gistry=E2=80=9D > registration to reference this doc instead of 8878. I think it should > actually reference both. > > > > Additionally, has the wg considered updating the media type registration > made in > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8878#name-the-application-zstd-media- > for consistency? I am ok with not updating it, as the link is also done v= ia > the document, but just checking for consistency. > > > > ## Notes > > > > This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can us= e > the > > [`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into > > individual GitHub issues. > > > > [ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md > > [ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments > > --000000000000d4b434061ded3c72 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Francesca,

Sounds good! Just landed PR #2839 to add the reference.

Thanks,
Nidhi

On Tue, Jul 2= 3, 2024 at 9:52=E2=80=AFPM Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.= com> wrote:

Hi Nid= hi, thanks for the quick reply.

=C2=A0

Re add= ing the reference to RFC 8878 as well in the IANA registry, I still think i= t should be done: the Zstandard protocol mentioned in the description of th= e IANA registration is still only defined in 8878 (I would have another opinion if this docume= nt replaced 8878, but that=E2=80=99s not the case here).

=C2=A0

Ok for= the media type, sounds fine as is.

=C2=A0

I will= request the last call now.

=C2=A0

France= sca

=C2=A0<= /span>

From: Nidhi Jaju <nidhijaju@google.com>
Date: Tuesday, 23 July 2024 at 10:08
To: Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-zstd-window-size@ietf.org <draft-ietf-httpbis-zstd-window-size@ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group= <ietf-http-wg@= w3.org>
Subject: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-zstd-window-size-01<= /u>

Thank you for the quick review!

I filed an issue with your feedback at=C2=A0https://github.com/htt= pwg/http-extensions/issues/2838 and replied with=C2=A0the following:=

I see that this document updates the IANA =E2=80=9CH= TTP Content Coding Registry=E2=80=9D registration to reference this doc ins= tead of 8878. I think it should actually reference both.

=C2=A0

Although I'm open t= o adding a reference to RFC 8878 as well, I'm just wondering if referen= cing both docs would confuse people since we want to make sure that they se= e the size restriction before using the token.

Additionally, has the wg considered updating the med= ia type registration made in https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8878#name-the-application-zstd-media-= for consistency? I am ok with not updating it, as the link is also done vi= a the document, but just checking for consistency.

=C2=A0

This doc is specificall= y for HTTP Content Coding use cases so IIUC we don't really want to res= trict the media type itself. Applications are free to transfer zstd archive= s that used any window size around as files, but we just don't want to require HTTP clients/servers to (de)c= ompress with window sizes above 8 MB.

Thanks,
Nidhi

On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 7:30=E2=80=AFAM Francesca Palombini <francesca.palomb= ini@ericsson.com> wrote:

# AD Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-zstd-window-size-0= 1

=C2=A0

cc @fpalombini

=C2=A0

Thank you for this document, short and to the point. I only have= one comment/question, before initiating the IETF last call.<= u>

=C2=A0

Francesca

=C2=A0

## Comments

=C2=A0

### Reference in IANA registries

=C2=A0

I see that this document update= s the IANA =E2=80=9CHTTP Content Coding Registry=E2=80=9D registration to r= eference this doc instead of 8878. I think it should actually reference both.

=C2=A0

Additionally, has the wg consid= ered updating the media type registration made in https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8878#name-the-application-zstd-media-= for consistency? I am ok with not updating it, as the link is also done vi= a the document, but just checking for consistency.

=C2=A0

## Notes

=C2=A0

This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Mar= kdown format][ICMF], You can use the

[`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert= this review into

individual GitHub issues.

=C2=A0

[ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md=

[ICT]: https:/= /github.com/mnot/ietf-comments

=
--000000000000d4b434061ded3c72--