IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: h2specd

Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au> Tue, 09 August 2016 00:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC2F412D10F for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 17:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.167
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.167 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZYKy2geIuXro for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 17:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DE8412D198 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 17:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1bWui1-0000Jt-8y for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 00:15:53 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 00:15:53 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1bWui1-0000Jt-8y@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <phluid61@gmail.com>) id 1bWuhu-0000J6-LP for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 00:15:46 +0000
Received: from mail-io0-f181.google.com ([209.85.223.181]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <phluid61@gmail.com>) id 1bWuhm-00043U-KF for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 00:15:41 +0000
Received: by mail-io0-f181.google.com with SMTP id q83so373653937iod.1 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 17:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=qJzd3s3ZbPDecxZszVtDjQVW7tufXOcfOe+xnxtvT74=; b=tFeiKf8gLfQREy5X33DZFiOIRDydG0hhY2TrtHDarRhFWIJiTSUmKQBkdhYWmyjpFc Ara9MKoIeKKkybz0NaXUZ+qi0CWCZJwPSJRxQqqXEu0DEObO5upiLgiLTUOf1UlndN+S Yar13GqrbI/gAjFNrWBQK27NxTIk3357oSojv2CMLhmOh/L/6gzv+QaPKDZAfnWHzlg7 /gZ4rMyrk+HeYc24d5tXIE0K5r+nR36D2fQRSfYcUvMyojO0aOFprOBvlJh41FRpK60i oa697QQXSPRFPtPVSSKiY1RYZmVzugoI/1K+iJhzkU5RrzzhEdxyiiCs2WsO2fXbCgXP nf5A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qJzd3s3ZbPDecxZszVtDjQVW7tufXOcfOe+xnxtvT74=; b=KHiZK+1Eq5qlJO7EDwzS6X8nGB3RaeG6CQ29G4PyThHS1vwjjVXiZkWZpQEVTmL559 Sjqo7QSHgZcaRn0ZWC6Lp4PxzOfINkgGsTfksbHY5AgGe4c6+Lmjop7kTryQE5qF6lbV ZmZFigB/oLSypakTMol4wFKrfYQgTdtTdlNbb9Q1Z6cyhju/cPQ3GRllbVO0ekejXb4D ndeqdJyd5tOOD+AdS9yYgQ9/aMuFdgfpcR6zWw0rwb3tj2/QGDiD7vlgLyRJyBQjppEc 9Rc1tipklGbjjSOTKUInKq9Jx3OvqHNwphln461zAqcNTAPd3Ts9GG01MbgcyeAHSO8v 70/Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvhIsPllTF4MbN5c3/+JmyrEyy/baPhmTJvBpaNZAnXLNHWW7EavG1W4jcQ/CrmVduqsrICDwaWUU3gmw==
X-Received: by 10.107.51.8 with SMTP id z8mr19331116ioz.176.1470701712582; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 17:15:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: phluid61@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.158.207 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 17:15:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BLUPR03MB1330727795ADF31E591ADA60871B0@BLUPR03MB1330.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20160805.104444.1410432152555522623.kazu@iij.ad.jp> <BLUPR03MB1330727795ADF31E591ADA60871B0@BLUPR03MB1330.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
From: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 10:15:12 +1000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: hqywrGjJ3uALp9FpaGc2zJLcj0Y
Message-ID: <CACweHNCczd0g1yTpM7e4=-Cyv74hwEdBeSVt39Fq=rUyHgopTg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
Cc: Kazu Yamamoto <kazu@iij.ad.jp>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "razvan.certezeanu14@imperial.ac.uk" <razvan.certezeanu14@imperial.ac.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113a8dbc262e290539986d4a"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.223.181; envelope-from=phluid61@gmail.com; helo=mail-io0-f181.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.786, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1bWuhm-00043U-KF 6b234abd43d234af0367ce766f04e49e
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: h2specd
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CACweHNCczd0g1yTpM7e4=-Cyv74hwEdBeSVt39Fq=rUyHgopTg@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32239
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 9 August 2016 at 09:50, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> wrote:

> I like the idea, but I misunderstood the intent from your message.  I read
> it as a set of tests *for* an HTTP/2 server, but looking at the GitHub
> page, it appears to *be* an HTTP server that tests clients.  Is that
> correct?  If so, I'd like to see the reverse as well -- submitting similar
> cases to an HTTP/2 server to test compliance.
>
>
​h2spec
already exists[1]; I use it to test my dev server.
h2spec*d* is, presumably the daemon/server equivalent.

Cheers

​[1]: https://github.com/summerwind/h2spec
-- 
  Matthew Kerwin
  http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email