Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Thu, 08 December 2016 05:15 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE8CF129C90 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 21:15:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.797
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.797 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6T-sIVQ7jQ-D for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 21:15:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E784E129C6B for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 21:15:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cEqzy-0002w0-F9 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 05:12:02 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 05:12:02 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cEqzy-0002w0-F9@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1cEqzp-0002vF-A2 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 05:11:53 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1cEqzi-0006xR-Fh for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 05:11:48 +0000
Received: from [192.168.3.104] (unknown [124.189.98.244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49B6422E259; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 00:11:19 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <3A206EA7-57FB-4913-BC08-445BD2EFA783@mnot.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 16:11:16 +1100
Cc: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <99304A44-6A36-4172-A762-7CDEA340F670@mnot.net>
References: <3A206EA7-57FB-4913-BC08-445BD2EFA783@mnot.net>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.746, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1cEqzi-0006xR-Fh e68acd44bb61a3bfc325a0a8518e0b74
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/99304A44-6A36-4172-A762-7CDEA340F670@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33130
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I've marked JFV as a "Dead WG Document", and added PHK's source markdown to our repo:
  https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/blob/master/draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure.md
.. making a few tweaks to get it into our toolchain.

PHK, please have a look, and if it looks OK to you, submit as a -00 (see SUBMITTING.md, and feel free to ask for help).

Cheers,



> On 21 Nov. 2016, at 1:38 pm, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> 
> In Seoul, we discussed both of these specs:
>  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv
>  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kamp-httpbis-structure
> 
> Draft minutes:
>  https://github.com/httpwg/wg-materials/blob/gh-pages/ietf97/minutes.md#draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv-and-draft-kamp-httpbis-structure
> 
> The feeling in the room was that we should abandon the JFV draft and adopt the structure draft in its place, with the understanding that it better reflected our current thinking in this area.
> 
> If you have concerns about this, please bring them up on list ASAP; otherwise we'll proceed.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/