Re: Moving RFC7238 (308 Status Code) to Proposed Standard
Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Mon, 28 July 2014 05:25 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F2031A023E for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 22:25:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1fmbgtPNQbZs for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 22:25:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1C081A0217 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 22:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1XBdO4-0001GG-25 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 05:22:16 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 05:22:16 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1XBdO4-0001GG-25@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <w@1wt.eu>) id 1XBdNk-0001FN-BA for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 05:21:56 +0000
Received: from 1wt.eu ([62.212.114.60]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <w@1wt.eu>) id 1XBdNj-0001cC-7u for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 05:21:56 +0000
Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id s6S5LUJV002874; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 07:21:30 +0200
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 07:21:30 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20140728052130.GG31935@1wt.eu>
References: <0A6AA9B1-90EA-40D9-8CA3-4566DB7F9F2B@mnot.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0A6AA9B1-90EA-40D9-8CA3-4566DB7F9F2B@mnot.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=62.212.114.60; envelope-from=w@1wt.eu; helo=1wt.eu
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.793, BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.63, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1XBdNj-0001cC-7u 7db9bbcec307233c0e0188b4cee01715
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Moving RFC7238 (308 Status Code) to Proposed Standard
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20140728052130.GG31935@1wt.eu>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/26405
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:40:15PM +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote: > In Toronto, we discussed moving RFC7238 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7238> > from Experimental to Proposed Standard, now that it is implemented in most > browsers. > > The WG in the room seemed to think that doing so is a good idea; anyone here > have a reason to believe otherwise? FWIW I support this good idea as well. Willy
- Moving RFC7238 (308 Status Code) to Proposed Stan… Mark Nottingham
- Re: Moving RFC7238 (308 Status Code) to Proposed … Willy Tarreau
- Re: Moving RFC7238 (308 Status Code) to Proposed … Amos Jeffries
- Re: Moving RFC7238 (308 Status Code) to Proposed … Tony Hansen
- Re: Moving RFC7238 (308 Status Code) to Proposed … Mark Nottingham
- Re: Moving RFC7238 (308 Status Code) to Proposed … Barry Leiba