Re: #295: Applying original fragment to "plain" redirected URI (also #43)

Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Wed, 04 January 2012 05:49 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF66C21F8518 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 21:49:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.600, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_17=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_48=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QVFryJFvIVeM for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 21:49:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F137821F84DC for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 21:49:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1RiJiA-00025y-FI for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 05:48:30 +0000
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <w@1wt.eu>) id 1RiJi4-000255-B4 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 05:48:24 +0000
Received: from 1wt.eu ([62.212.114.60]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <w@1wt.eu>) id 1RiJi2-0005wJ-UY for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 05:48:24 +0000
Received: (from willy@localhost) by mail.home.local (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id q045jDBj011968; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 06:45:13 +0100
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 06:45:13 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20120104054513.GA11965@1wt.eu>
References: <6A53E99A-019D-4F6D-A33D-24524CD34E17@mnot.net> <4EFDFA17.4080804@gmx.de> <4F031419.1050708@gmx.de> <4F03DFA6.3070002@treenet.co.nz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F03DFA6.3070002@treenet.co.nz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=62.212.114.60; envelope-from=w@1wt.eu; helo=1wt.eu
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.828, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1RiJi2-0005wJ-UY 35336c42a1f051981604c83ca17032c5
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: #295: Applying original fragment to "plain" redirected URI (also #43)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20120104054513.GA11965@1wt.eu>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/11965
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Resent-Message-Id: <E1RiJiA-00025y-FI@frink.w3.org>
Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 05:48:30 +0000

On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 06:12:06PM +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 4/01/2012 3:43 a.m., Julian Reschke wrote:
> >
> >"Almost", because it doesn't use Base.fragment when R.frament is 
> >undefined.
> >
> >a) Should we try describe the algorithm based on RFC 3986 ("do 
> >relative resolution as defined by ..., then, if the result doesn't 
> >have a fragment, add the one from the Base URI")?
> 
> +1 on this.

+1 too.

Willy