IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: port #?

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Fri, 07 June 2013 09:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D774721F89FF for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 02:12:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.849
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.849 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.250, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lg7OVQXQkDbg for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 02:12:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A95421F8AF7 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 02:12:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Uksh7-0006Kw-Oi for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 09:10:49 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 09:10:49 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Uksh7-0006Kw-Oi@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <lear@cisco.com>) id 1Uksgu-0006IX-0k for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 09:10:36 +0000
Received: from ams-iport-3.cisco.com ([144.254.224.146]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <lear@cisco.com>) id 1Uksgl-0002dz-FK for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 09:10:35 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=866; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1370596227; x=1371805827; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nFTJ1HfjJkufUDxERkrZungzB5WyhBx7NMDsPLWJtfI=; b=eZ1EWHl61ZEQrd3kT4gG084DWNTlHdB6GdwFbCgkdildTU9WnyF0VLP7 2Y7ew4qsNp0khqUzG3ZGEE1P6j0E6lFtsCNJ8/z32sM50Ekgf76do7+KQ RRD1P0zfma7PGfbjQP4q3jZ2sbKvdwHnRH7K4lgZY/31wfDOKr/e1b6Q5 M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AggFAO2isVGQ/khM/2dsb2JhbABZgwkwgzy4PYJ5fBZ0giMBAQEEI1UBEAsYAgIFFgsCAgkDAgECASsaBg0BBwEBiAmqKZF1gSaODAeCR4EUA5c/kUCDETo
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,820,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="14060947"
Received: from ams-core-3.cisco.com ([144.254.72.76]) by ams-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Jun 2013 09:10:00 +0000
Received: from mctiny.local ([10.61.203.109]) by ams-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r5799w3D014471 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 7 Jun 2013 09:09:59 GMT
Message-ID: <51B1A368.6030209@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 11:10:00 +0200
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
CC: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <51B1937B.70808@cisco.com> <51B19B8A.2000800@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <51B19B8A.2000800@gmx.de>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=144.254.224.146; envelope-from=lear@cisco.com; helo=ams-iport-3.cisco.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.347, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1Uksgl-0002dz-FK e8c69495e765970ebb30379d62e6f358
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: port #?
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/51B1A368.6030209@cisco.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18195
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Julian,

Right you are.  So... propose some text?

Eliot



On 6/7/13 10:36 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2013-06-07 10:02, Eliot Lear wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I note that we still haven't cleaned up the connection model
>> sufficiently.  When someone implements a specification they need to know
>> at least the port number to connect to. This is the document that has to
>> specify at least at a bare minimum how that happens.  This can be
>> handled in at least one of four ways:
>>
>> 1.  We refer to RFC-2616 normatively.  This implies that we will not
>> obsolete 2616 at this time.  If we do so later we would need to pull the
>> HTTP URI definition out and update the IANA definition.
>
> Hm, no. draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging is what's relevant (and should
> stay relevant).
>
>> ...
>
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status