IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method

James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com> Thu, 05 November 2020 10:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 330823A0EBC for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 02:36:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=webcomposite-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6gG9CM5VDdt5 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 02:36:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 346F53A0EAD for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 02:36:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1kaca9-0001NW-Gy for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 10:33:29 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 10:33:29 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1kaca9-0001NW-Gy@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <jim@webcomposite.com>) id 1kaca8-0001Mg-2B for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 10:33:28 +0000
Received: from mail-io1-xd31.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <jim@webcomposite.com>) id 1kaca5-0002HC-W4 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 10:33:27 +0000
Received: by mail-io1-xd31.google.com with SMTP id u21so1244431iol.12 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 02:33:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=webcomposite-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+G93A71owCnyuapyg0DwBVzikLVvqZAOy/2fGLaxulY=; b=ENoMcX+EMyXvnKpjqwi2m1PDdQ1SNKcDJF+m6InPB0ylg2r6qdVE4zPAoXTqfuNT3P OKghdSe9FQfQF5bcHm2oCJSSfgSPzscqFJ4LN9bzE2hyUU1/VPzwrd9tgRwJCX79hQmq /SKm3kopkFAPhP8RST83nZv+7BARy81+DBWqwHLHBGdq6VSWtX49T8/MkOJQon+u67gE Mk1u5RUVHHuV0KQaeeLgIFp+9CLQHv9cVR5+TywRT8M9fCWFF26eONG28+OU5pIoRoty PQ00fttHYi6/JTng+JNXZUt+aYfbp1v5h9rXe+nbID2qtqetWqVoS/YgLXR4nwUOXdJk QFiA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+G93A71owCnyuapyg0DwBVzikLVvqZAOy/2fGLaxulY=; b=mZLfJNrnHbw1uQ2X8Gqo+kfOuqKCk/aGl3TCRf7AORyAr1Ocpumw2TdrQc1QGV7ZF7 1Fd4rSOa32H6ij7Mb+n3q75a4aOYjtU64XvmEdFSVhWTPfop+s8MdzokfJHoW5iyLOmd sXGYhEIHJJRv0dPfDeXkU/WvsnIEMrZHUTUx+G9RpFdQZRIKI2kqxp3IBBUUVC9GNfLL G51eYZZGwbZnRVVfuQRm80vD9s9FhAEJRDDSeUONgvcITzcv1SYxMQPGWZYzCI2/z+jU aV6DJiCxgbg1obrY+JjTh+yhtM9b+S0WfTDPlDl5YTrSqZG296nQwul4FVlxj/bL5MkN Sfyg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533DsZIPYYcluT9IzmI1zuu2G7pX9sVCz7tUIFZwsxHm7NTyHv/v u26c8u5gc9qJU1HyMXD5vPSdIrK+C1gly/g38xuIXQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzGh9PnGLVQe4b7A3dKwxhcFz5ii4q/soQAHr4jto4ugHP/8RTqUC52RpNEmvDmJPymOwmH/aamYfHYcJLzQM0=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:898c:: with SMTP id m12mr1220709iol.196.1604572394674; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 02:33:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <F0556EC2-D5AD-47FF-A780-15949F57A911@mnot.net> <8AE9002C-78DE-41E6-8D5E-C2FAF76A3A3B@bzfx.net> <a09e0f19-f1ca-1e70-05d6-f59f4fe06cec@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <a09e0f19-f1ca-1e70-05d6-f59f4fe06cec@gmx.de>
From: James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 11:33:03 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEaz5mvdTNGtxkB26cp9NpTSr1kD5Bpb1t_LBBEX349yCqS2cg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "HTTPbis WG (IETF)" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received-SPF: none client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31; envelope-from=jim@webcomposite.com; helo=mail-io1-xd31.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1kaca5-0002HC-W4 8792bfd423c255a48ea0e406b9458a98
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CAEaz5mvdTNGtxkB26cp9NpTSr1kD5Bpb1t_LBBEX349yCqS2cg@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/38174
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 10:46, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> Am 04.11.2020 um 21:40 schrieb Austin Wright:
> > ...
> > I’m very much in favor of a safe variation of POST.
> >
> > However,
> >
> >> for backwards compatibility with existing WebDAV implementations, SEARCH requests that use the text/xml or application/xml content types MUST be processed per the requirements established by [RFC5323  <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5323>].
> >
> > I think this is too restrictive. If it’s not possible to relax the
> > RFC5323 requirements, I would favor using REPORT instead.
> > ...
>
> We can relax the requirement to apply only to */xml which has a document
> element in the "DAV:" namespace (see
> <https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc5323.html#rfc.section.2.2.2>, or
> even restrict it to the two element names defined there).

+1 ... seems a reasonable compromise to me.

Jim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email